The Psalter in Exile: Translation, Correction, and Revision of the Psalms at the Stuart Court in Saint-Germain-en-Laye

The paper concerns a little-known rendition of the Psalms, translated into English at the exiled court of King James II at Saint-Germain-en-Laye, and printed anonymously first in 1700, and then in a revised and corrected edition in 1704. The translators were John Caryll and David Nairne. Thanks to the preservation of Nairne’s Diary, we can meticulously examine the translation process and reconstruct the division of labour between these men. My discovery of the copy of the translation that Nairne made for Queen Mary of Modena immediately upon the completion of the original translation in 1697 (i.e., before the text was significantly altered by reviewers) offers a unique glimpse into the revision process. In-depth analysis of the variant readings introduced in the subsequent redactions reveals that the applied review procedures, though comprising a conglomerate of reviewers, represented a guided and systematic process aimed at both securing the approbations necessary to print the translation and providing readers with the best possible text.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18290/rh24725.2s
Primary Topic
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Psalter in Exile: Translation, Correction, and Revision of the Psalms at the Stuart Court in Saint-Germain-en-Laye

Magdalena Charzyńska‐Wójcik
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
article

The Psalter in Exile: Translation, Correction, and Revision of the Psalms at the Stuart Court in Saint-Germain-en-Laye

Magdalena Charzyńska‐Wójcik
article en

Abstract

The paper concerns a little-known rendition of the Psalms, translated into English at the exiled court of King James II at Saint-Germain-en-Laye, and printed anonymously first in 1700, and then in a revised and corrected edition in 1704. The translators were John Caryll and David Nairne. Thanks to the preservation of Nairne’s Diary, we can meticulously examine the translation process and reconstruct the division of labour between these men. My discovery of the copy of the translation that Nairne made for Queen Mary of Modena immediately upon the completion of the original translation in 1697 (i.e., before the text was significantly altered by reviewers) offers a unique glimpse into the revision process. In-depth analysis of the variant readings introduced in the subsequent redactions reveals that the applied review procedures, though comprising a conglomerate of reviewers, represented a guided and systematic process aimed at both securing the approbations necessary to print the translation and providing readers with the best possible text.

Roczniki HumanistyczneVol. 72(5 Zeszyt specjalny)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.