Affective Polarisation in Citizens’ Own Words

Research on affective polarisation is increasingly focused on conflict between broader political groups beyond party electorates. We add to this literature by exploring how affective polarisation is shaped by citizens’ construction of political group boundaries. Employing a qualitative approach, the study reanalyses focus group data collected between 2019 and 2021 in Belgium. The results reveal that citizens affirm the distinction between vertical and horizontal dimensions of polarisation, but also that political elites are considered without distinguishing along party lines. Second, horizontally, participants rarely mention party electorates, challenging the partisan focus of affective polarisation research. To better understand how affective polarisation takes shape, we zoom in on several socio-political groups that were salient throughout all focus groups. We examine the intersubjective negotiation of group boundaries and how they shape affective polarisation. In turn, we question the seemingly mechanistic nature of intergroup relations and highlight the affective weight group boundaries hold.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics of the Low Countries
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/plc/.000083
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Affective Polarisation in Citizens’ Own Words

Virginie Van Ingelgom, Louise Knops, Lien Smets, Henry Maes et al.
2 citations
Politics of the Low Countries
Social Media and Politics
1.91
article

Affective Polarisation in Citizens’ Own Words

Virginie Van Ingelgom, Louise Knops, Lien Smets, Henry Maes, Ambroos Verwee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Research on affective polarisation is increasingly focused on conflict between broader political groups beyond party electorates. We add to this literature by exploring how affective polarisation is shaped by citizens’ construction of political group boundaries. Employing a qualitative approach, the study reanalyses focus group data collected between 2019 and 2021 in Belgium. The results reveal that citizens affirm the distinction between vertical and horizontal dimensions of polarisation, but also that political elites are considered without distinguishing along party lines. Second, horizontally, participants rarely mention party electorates, challenging the partisan focus of affective polarisation research. To better understand how affective polarisation takes shape, we zoom in on several socio-political groups that were salient throughout all focus groups. We examine the intersubjective negotiation of group boundaries and how they shape affective polarisation. In turn, we question the seemingly mechanistic nature of intergroup relations and highlight the affective weight group boundaries hold.

Politics of the Low CountriesVol. 6(3)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), UCLouvain (BE)
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Social Media and Politics
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.