How can the environmental impacts of wheat cultivation and wheat flour production be reduced? A life cycle assessment of Brazilian wheat

Wheat and wheat flour play a vital role in global food security. There is a knowledge gap regarding the environmental impacts associated with wheat cultivation and wheat flour production in subtropical and tropical environments. As one of the world's major grain producers, Brazil needs to identify and mitigate the environmental impacts of its agricultural products. This study aimed to (1) identify the environmental impacts of the Brazilian wheat cultivation and flour production system and (2) propose strategies to mitigate the environmental impacts. The study was conducted in Brazil's main wheat-producing region, assessing 61 farms in the wheat cultivation, grain transport, processing, and milling processes. Environmental impacts were calculated using SimaPro 9.5.0.2 with the Ecoinvent® v3.5 database. Wheat cultivation was the primary source of environmental impacts in Brazilian wheat flour production, contributing between 67% and 98% across the categories analysed. The carbon footprint of wheat cultivation was 0.50 kg CO 2 eq kg wheat −1 , while wheat flour production ranged from 0.67 to 0.80 kg CO 2 eq kg flour wheat −1 . Field emissions, particularly N₂O from urea, significantly impacted the global warming potential (GWP). The grain transport had a marginal environmental impact (<1.5%), and the grain processing contributed minimally, while wheat milling had a higher impact on freshwater eutrophication potential (FEP). Replacing urea with calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and more productive wheat varieties reduced environmental impacts in the wheat cultivation process. The use of photovoltaic energy in grain processing and milling reduced industrial environmental impacts. Brazilian wheat flour proved to be environmentally competitive compared to production in other countries, especially in terms of carbon footprint, providing insights into wheat cultivation for subtropical and tropical environments. • C footprint ranged from 0.67 to 0.80 kg CO 2 eq per kg of wheat flour − produced. • Wheat cultivation contributed to the highest impacts in the wheat flour production. • Field emissions, especially N₂O from urea, were significant for C footprint (GWP). • Photovoltaic energy use reduced the environmental impacts of wheat flour production. • Brazilian wheat flour is environmentally competitive compared to other countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144650
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How can the environmental impacts of wheat cultivation and wheat flour production be reduced? A life cycle assessment of Brazilian wheat

José Paulo Pereira das Dores Savioli, Marília I. S. Folegatti, V. Giongo, Anderson Santi et al.
12 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5.51
article

How can the environmental impacts of wheat cultivation and wheat flour production be reduced? A life cycle assessment of Brazilian wheat

José Paulo Pereira das Dores Savioli, Marília I. S. Folegatti, V. Giongo, Anderson Santi, A. da S. Acosta, A. J. do Amaral, Álvaro Augusto Dossa, Bruno Stephano Pires, J. E. Denardin, Eduardo Caierão, Bruna Regina Figura da Silva, O. V. Vieira, Mônica da Silva Santana, Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo, T. Martins
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Wheat and wheat flour play a vital role in global food security. There is a knowledge gap regarding the environmental impacts associated with wheat cultivation and wheat flour production in subtropical and tropical environments. As one of the world's major grain producers, Brazil needs to identify and mitigate the environmental impacts of its agricultural products. This study aimed to (1) identify the environmental impacts of the Brazilian wheat cultivation and flour production system and (2) propose strategies to mitigate the environmental impacts. The study was conducted in Brazil's main wheat-producing region, assessing 61 farms in the wheat cultivation, grain transport, processing, and milling processes. Environmental impacts were calculated using SimaPro 9.5.0.2 with the Ecoinvent® v3.5 database. Wheat cultivation was the primary source of environmental impacts in Brazilian wheat flour production, contributing between 67% and 98% across the categories analysed. The carbon footprint of wheat cultivation was 0.50 kg CO 2 eq kg wheat −1 , while wheat flour production ranged from 0.67 to 0.80 kg CO 2 eq kg flour wheat −1 . Field emissions, particularly N₂O from urea, significantly impacted the global warming potential (GWP). The grain transport had a marginal environmental impact (<1.5%), and the grain processing contributed minimally, while wheat milling had a higher impact on freshwater eutrophication potential (FEP). Replacing urea with calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and more productive wheat varieties reduced environmental impacts in the wheat cultivation process. The use of photovoltaic energy in grain processing and milling reduced industrial environmental impacts. Brazilian wheat flour proved to be environmentally competitive compared to production in other countries, especially in terms of carbon footprint, providing insights into wheat cultivation for subtropical and tropical environments. • C footprint ranged from 0.67 to 0.80 kg CO 2 eq per kg of wheat flour − produced. • Wheat cultivation contributed to the highest impacts in the wheat flour production. • Field emissions, especially N₂O from urea, were significant for C footprint (GWP). • Photovoltaic energy use reduced the environmental impacts of wheat flour production. • Brazilian wheat flour is environmentally competitive compared to other countries.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 489
Universidade de Passo Fundo (BR), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR), Ausonius Institut de Recherche sur l'Antiquité et le Moyen age (FR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.