Image Classification Based on ResNet Models

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) hold significant importance in the image categorization field. The issue of vanishing gradients with increasing dataset size is effectively addressed by ResNet through its residual blocks. This paper focuses on comparing the outcomes of 2 ResNet models using the CIFAR10 dataset. The 60,000 photos in the CIFAR10 dataset are split equally between 10 classes. Preprocessing steps for the data, including normalization and augmentation, are part of the experiment. The cross-entropy loss function is employed for optimization. Results indicate that ResNet18 outperformed ResNet50. For ResNet18, the training loss decreased from 1.8464 to 0.2006, and accuracy increased from 0.3311 to 0.9286 with a test accuracy of 0.8294. In contrast, for ResNet50, training loss went from 5.3736 to 0.4618, and accuracy rose from 0.0989 to 0.8377 with a test accuracy of 0.7604. One possible reason for this outcome is that ResNet50 might be more prone to overfitting due to many more parameters and the CIFAR10 dataset’s small size. Additionally, different hyperparameter settings and data augmentation fine-tuning might also contribute.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/c5xnwg67
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Image Classification Based on ResNet Models

Yu Xu
Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection
Machine Learning and Data Classification
article

Image Classification Based on ResNet Models

Yu Xu
article en

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) hold significant importance in the image categorization field. The issue of vanishing gradients with increasing dataset size is effectively addressed by ResNet through its residual blocks. This paper focuses on comparing the outcomes of 2 ResNet models using the CIFAR10 dataset. The 60,000 photos in the CIFAR10 dataset are split equally between 10 classes. Preprocessing steps for the data, including normalization and augmentation, are part of the experiment. The cross-entropy loss function is employed for optimization. Results indicate that ResNet18 outperformed ResNet50. For ResNet18, the training loss decreased from 1.8464 to 0.2006, and accuracy increased from 0.3311 to 0.9286 with a test accuracy of 0.8294. In contrast, for ResNet50, training loss went from 5.3736 to 0.4618, and accuracy rose from 0.0989 to 0.8377 with a test accuracy of 0.7604. One possible reason for this outcome is that ResNet50 might be more prone to overfitting due to many more parameters and the CIFAR10 dataset’s small size. Additionally, different hyperparameter settings and data augmentation fine-tuning might also contribute.

Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental ProtectionVol. 1(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.