Geometric Feature Characterization of Apple Trees from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud Data

The geometric feature characterization of fruit trees plays a role in effective management in orchards. LiDAR (light detection and ranging) technology for object detection enables the rapid and precise evaluation of geometric features. This study aimed to quantify the height, canopy volume, tree spacing, and row spacing in an apple orchard using a three-dimensional (3D) LiDAR sensor. A LiDAR sensor was used to collect 3D point cloud data from the apple orchard. Six samples of apple trees, representing a variety of shapes and sizes, were selected for data collection and validation. Commercial software and the python programming language were utilized to process the collected data. The data processing steps involved data conversion, radius outlier removal, voxel grid downsampling, denoising through filtering and erroneous points, segmentation of the region of interest (ROI), clustering using the density-based spatial clustering (DBSCAN) algorithm, data transformation, and the removal of ground points. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the estimated outputs from the point cloud with the corresponding measured values. The sensor-estimated and measured tree heights were 3.05 ± 0.34 m and 3.13 ± 0.33 m, respectively, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.08 m, a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.09 m, a linear coefficient of determination (r²) of 0.98, a confidence interval (CI) of -0.14 to -0.02 m, and a high concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.96, indicating strong agreement and high accuracy. The sensor-estimated and measured canopy volumes were 13.76 ± 2.46 m³ and 14.09 ± 2.10 m³, respectively, with an MAE of 0.57 m³, an RMSE of 0.61 m³, an r² value of 0.97, and a CI of -0.92 to 0.26, demonstrating high precision. For tree and row spacing, the sensor-estimated distances and measured distances were 3.04 ± 0.17 and 3.18 ± 0.24 m, and 3.35 ± 0.08 and 3.40 ± 0.05 m, respectively, with RMSE and r² values of 0.12 m and 0.92 for tree spacing, and 0.07 m and 0.94 for row spacing, respectively. The MAE and CI values were 0.09 m, 0.05 m, and -0.18 for tree spacing and 0.01, -0.1, and 0.002 for row spacing, respectively. Although minor differences were observed, the sensor estimates were efficient, though specific measurements require further refinement. The results are based on a limited dataset of six measured values, providing initial insights into geometric feature characterization performance. However, a larger dataset would offer a more reliable accuracy assessment. The small sample size (six apple trees) limits the generalizability of the findings and necessitates caution in interpreting the results. Future studies should incorporate a broader and more diverse dataset to validate and refine the characterization, enhancing management practices in apple orchards.