Question-Led Innovation: Public priorities for enhanced weathering research in Malaysia

When upscaling novel techniques for Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), public attitudes are crucial, yet there is a serious lack of social science research outside of Western nations. CDR research can clearly benefit from maximising inclusion and opening up to diverse perspectives, including those of local communities, and ideally should involve public insight into the questions we should be prioritising. This paper reports results from a major deliberative study on public perceptions of CDR in Malaysia. We demonstrate a novel, transferrable methodology called “Question-Led Innovation”, in which lay public and local stakeholders are empowered to ask actionable questions on a novel intervention or innovation. These questions are then used as the basis for identifying priorities for future scientific research. We apply the methodology to a case study of CDR via Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW) on tropical palm oil agriculture in Sabah. We find that much of the current research on ERW is actually in-line with what our participants most wanted to know about, particularly regarding the rock resource and its sources. Nevertheless, significant knowledge gaps remain, particularly on life-cycle CO 2 emissions and sequestration, and impacts on aquatic life. Many questions also related to socio-economic factors, particularly around governance, regulation, and cost, therefore we argue that such topics should be a priority for future research. Embedding Question-Led Innovation into an ongoing programme of scientific research shapes the future of ERW research to prioritise questions which matter most to people on the ground. • Presents "Question-Led Innovation" methodology for integrating public priorities into research and innovation • Case study of community perceptions of Enhanced Rock Weathering in Sabah, Malaysia. • Knowledge gaps for enhanced weathering include life-cycle CO2 emissions, impacts on aquatic life, and socio-economic factors • Links social science with natural science, and addresses underrepresentation of Global South perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103977
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Question-Led Innovation: Public priorities for enhanced weathering research in Malaysia

Richard P. Lim, Emily Cox, Elspeth Spence, Nick Pidgeon et al.
7 citations
Environmental Science & Policy
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
2.05
article

Question-Led Innovation: Public priorities for enhanced weathering research in Malaysia

Richard P. Lim, Emily Cox, Elspeth Spence, Nick Pidgeon, David J. Beerling, Martha E. Payne
article en
7 citations

Abstract

When upscaling novel techniques for Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), public attitudes are crucial, yet there is a serious lack of social science research outside of Western nations. CDR research can clearly benefit from maximising inclusion and opening up to diverse perspectives, including those of local communities, and ideally should involve public insight into the questions we should be prioritising. This paper reports results from a major deliberative study on public perceptions of CDR in Malaysia. We demonstrate a novel, transferrable methodology called “Question-Led Innovation”, in which lay public and local stakeholders are empowered to ask actionable questions on a novel intervention or innovation. These questions are then used as the basis for identifying priorities for future scientific research. We apply the methodology to a case study of CDR via Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW) on tropical palm oil agriculture in Sabah. We find that much of the current research on ERW is actually in-line with what our participants most wanted to know about, particularly regarding the rock resource and its sources. Nevertheless, significant knowledge gaps remain, particularly on life-cycle CO 2 emissions and sequestration, and impacts on aquatic life. Many questions also related to socio-economic factors, particularly around governance, regulation, and cost, therefore we argue that such topics should be a priority for future research. Embedding Question-Led Innovation into an ongoing programme of scientific research shapes the future of ERW research to prioritise questions which matter most to people on the ground. • Presents "Question-Led Innovation" methodology for integrating public priorities into research and innovation • Case study of community perceptions of Enhanced Rock Weathering in Sabah, Malaysia. • Knowledge gaps for enhanced weathering include life-cycle CO2 emissions, impacts on aquatic life, and socio-economic factors • Links social science with natural science, and addresses underrepresentation of Global South perspectives.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 163
Leverhulme Trust (GB), Sabah Environmental Trust (MY), Cardiff University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Leverhulme Trust, Cardiff University
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.