Harmonization of Derivative Legislative Products Post-Constitutional Court Decision

A ruling by the Constitutional Court constitutes a judicial product, necessitating harmonization and synchronization between the Constitutional Court's decisions and subordinate regulations. This process is essential for the legislative body to ensure legal coherence. This study aims to demonstrate that insufficient communication between institutions may impede the timely alignment and harmonization of laws amended by the Constitutional Court with regulations beneath the statutory level, thereby creating conflicts among legal provisions. This qualitative research employs a descriptive approach to systematically and factually collect data, reflecting the situation during the study. The findings underscore the critical need to harmonize derivative legal products after Constitutional Court rulings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v3i01.1310
Primary Topic
Legal Language and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harmonization of Derivative Legislative Products Post-Constitutional Court Decision

Arief Fahmi Lubis
Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies
Legal Language and Interpretation
article

Harmonization of Derivative Legislative Products Post-Constitutional Court Decision

Arief Fahmi Lubis
article en

Abstract

A ruling by the Constitutional Court constitutes a judicial product, necessitating harmonization and synchronization between the Constitutional Court's decisions and subordinate regulations. This process is essential for the legislative body to ensure legal coherence. This study aims to demonstrate that insufficient communication between institutions may impede the timely alignment and harmonization of laws amended by the Constitutional Court with regulations beneath the statutory level, thereby creating conflicts among legal provisions. This qualitative research employs a descriptive approach to systematically and factually collect data, reflecting the situation during the study. The findings underscore the critical need to harmonize derivative legal products after Constitutional Court rulings.

Journal of Progressive Law and Legal StudiesVol. 3(01)
Institut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Legal Language and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.