CO<sub>2</sub> Sequestration Technologies May Undermine China’s Sustainable Development Goals through the Climate-Energy-Air-Health Cascade

CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration technologies (CSTs) allow for increased CO<sub>2</sub> emissions without exceeding a chosen temperature limit by creating additional carbon budgets. While these CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration technologies offer low-cost routes to net-zero emissions, namely, the CST benefits, they impede progress to the Sustainable Development Goals, namely, the CST disbenefits. Focusing on China, we assess both the CST disbenefits and benefits in the climate-energy-air-health cascade by an integrated modeling framework. We show that, CST can save 4.98-15.65 trillion CNY in achieving net-zero emissions while compromising the sustainability on non-fossil energy penetration, air quality, and public health improvement, leading to a substantial loss up to 7.82 trillion CNY during 2020-2060. Given the high likelihood of a large-scale deployment of CSTs in the future, pursuing policy coherence that balances trade-offs between CST disbenefits and benefits is vital. To that end, CSTs should be allocated to power sectors as a priority and stringent end-of-pipe equipment should be retrofitted into non-power sectors before CST allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c09545
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CO2 Sequestration Technologies May Undermine China’s Sustainable Development Goals through the Climate-Energy-Air-Health Cascade

Zuhui Zhang, Hetong Wang, Fangming Jiang, Zhenci Xu et al.
7 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Climate Change Policy and Economics
7.90
article

CO2 Sequestration Technologies May Undermine China’s Sustainable Development Goals through the Climate-Energy-Air-Health Cascade

Zuhui Zhang, Hetong Wang, Fangming Jiang, Zhenci Xu, Yi Zhang, Qingyu Zhang, Zeyuan Liu, Wang Jinnan, Jing Zhu, Anqi Xu, Kai Fang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration technologies (CSTs) allow for increased CO<sub>2</sub> emissions without exceeding a chosen temperature limit by creating additional carbon budgets. While these CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration technologies offer low-cost routes to net-zero emissions, namely, the CST benefits, they impede progress to the Sustainable Development Goals, namely, the CST disbenefits. Focusing on China, we assess both the CST disbenefits and benefits in the climate-energy-air-health cascade by an integrated modeling framework. We show that, CST can save 4.98-15.65 trillion CNY in achieving net-zero emissions while compromising the sustainability on non-fossil energy penetration, air quality, and public health improvement, leading to a substantial loss up to 7.82 trillion CNY during 2020-2060. Given the high likelihood of a large-scale deployment of CSTs in the future, pursuing policy coherence that balances trade-offs between CST disbenefits and benefits is vital. To that end, CSTs should be allocated to power sectors as a priority and stringent end-of-pipe equipment should be retrofitted into non-power sectors before CST allocation.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 59(1)
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (CN), Shandong University (CN), Yangtze University (CN), Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, National Social Science Fund of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
7.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.