Analysing Problems of Chinese Pension Market and Proposing Solutions through Government Initiatives and Private Sector Strategies

This study aims to analyse the problems of the Chinese pension market and test whether the current solutions are effective. It combines two ideas of pension reform: privatisation and Richard Thaler’s “Save More Tomorrow” (SMT). A questionnaire was distributed to 577 interviewees to test whether these policies could work for them. The results are analysed using the Z-test and ANOVA test to examine the hypotheses. The results show that privatisation will fail at solving the pension crisis because people are insufficiently informed about the conditions in the pension market. Furthermore, they are more willing to invest to other areas other than private pensions. On the other hand, SMT will be effective as the money illusion makes people ignore the increase in pension rate when their wages increase at the same time. It provides a better policy for the Chinese government to solve the pension crisis. Furthermore, it also shows that the non-neoclassical paradigm can be effectively applied to policymaking.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/5hstsf44
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysing Problems of Chinese Pension Market and Proposing Solutions through Government Initiatives and Private Sector Strategies

Zhenzhuo Li
Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
Regional Development and Environment
article

Analysing Problems of Chinese Pension Market and Proposing Solutions through Government Initiatives and Private Sector Strategies

Zhenzhuo Li
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the problems of the Chinese pension market and test whether the current solutions are effective. It combines two ideas of pension reform: privatisation and Richard Thaler’s “Save More Tomorrow” (SMT). A questionnaire was distributed to 577 interviewees to test whether these policies could work for them. The results are analysed using the Z-test and ANOVA test to examine the hypotheses. The results show that privatisation will fail at solving the pension crisis because people are insufficiently informed about the conditions in the pension market. Furthermore, they are more willing to invest to other areas other than private pensions. On the other hand, SMT will be effective as the money illusion makes people ignore the increase in pension rate when their wages increase at the same time. It provides a better policy for the Chinese government to solve the pension crisis. Furthermore, it also shows that the non-neoclassical paradigm can be effectively applied to policymaking.

Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication StudiesVol. 1(10)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Regional Development and Environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.