Persuasiveness of Public Health Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Message Framing, Threat Appraisal, and Source Credibility Effects
This study examines the relative effectiveness of the UK government's public health messages used during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We focus on the use of a loss versus gain frame. We look at the effect of framing on behavioural inclination to follow COVID-19 guidance, as well as affective mechanisms and individual characteristic moderators that might explain said willingness. We ran two studies with a voluntary sample of the UK adult population (total <i>n</i> = 300). Across both studies, we only find a significant impact of message framing on the level of negative affect triggered, with the loss frame triggering a higher negative affect. Instead, attitude to public health communication had a direct and indirect effect on behavioural inclination. Our results suggest that threat minimisation and satisfaction with authorities handling a health crisis might be key to consider when developing effective public health communications.
Authors
- Natalia Stanulewicz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-3422)
- Edward Cartwright (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0194-9368)
Institutions
- Aston University (GB)
- De Montfort University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Published
- 2024-12-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22010030
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.05