CAD/CAM Technology in Dentistry: A Comparative Analysis of Milling 3D Printing Techniques

This review compares CAD/CAM technology in dentistry, focusing on milling and 3D printing regarding precision, material performance, clinical applications, and efficiency. Milling, a subtractive process, is renowned for its high precision, durability, and ability to produce restorations like crowns, bridges, and veneer that require long-term stability. In contrast, 3D printing, an additive process, offers greater design flexibility and efficiency, especially in the fabrication of temporary and complex restorations. The findings show that both methods are essential in modern dental practice, but the choice between milling and 3D printing depends on the specific clinical needs, the type of restoration, and advancements in material technology. Future research should prioritize the development of new composite materials that balance the durability of milled ceramics with the flexibility of printable resins. Additionally, investigating the integration of real-time feedback systems during the 3D printing process could further enhance precision in dental restorations. Exploring these avenues will help create more effective solutions tailored to diverse clinical needs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
MedScien
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/gvyptf73
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Research and COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CAD/CAM Technology in Dentistry: A Comparative Analysis of Milling 3D Printing Techniques

Chia‐Huang Wu
1 citations
MedScien
Dental Research and COVID-19
0.85
article

CAD/CAM Technology in Dentistry: A Comparative Analysis of Milling 3D Printing Techniques

Chia‐Huang Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This review compares CAD/CAM technology in dentistry, focusing on milling and 3D printing regarding precision, material performance, clinical applications, and efficiency. Milling, a subtractive process, is renowned for its high precision, durability, and ability to produce restorations like crowns, bridges, and veneer that require long-term stability. In contrast, 3D printing, an additive process, offers greater design flexibility and efficiency, especially in the fabrication of temporary and complex restorations. The findings show that both methods are essential in modern dental practice, but the choice between milling and 3D printing depends on the specific clinical needs, the type of restoration, and advancements in material technology. Future research should prioritize the development of new composite materials that balance the durability of milled ceramics with the flexibility of printable resins. Additionally, investigating the integration of real-time feedback systems during the 3D printing process could further enhance precision in dental restorations. Exploring these avenues will help create more effective solutions tailored to diverse clinical needs.

MedScienVol. 1(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Dental Research and COVID-19
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CAD/CAM Technology in Dentistry: A Comparative Analysis of Milling 3D Printing Techniques — Chia‐Huang Wu · MedScien (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS