Field behavior of a GRS bridge approach retaining wall on highly compressible foundation soils

To reveal the behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) bridge approach retaining walls on highly compressible foundation soils, in this study, a GRS bridge approach adjacent to the Yangtze River was monitored for approximately 3 years during construction and post-construction. The settlement of the GRS bridge approach, the vertical earth pressure at the base of the backfill soil, and the reinforcement deformation were monitored. The monitoring points were arranged on the left and right sides of a cross-section and a longitudinal section at the mid-span. The results showed that the settlement of the GRS bridge approach was large and uneven, and the settlement rates were influenced by the water level of the Yangtze River. Due to the large and differential settlement , the distributions of the vertical earth pressure and geogrid reinforcement strain for a retaining wall constructed on highly compressible foundation soils were different from those for a retaining wall constructed on stable foundation soils. The overall GRS bridge approach performed well with large settlements, with only some minor structural problems in the facing of the retaining wall. This indicated that the flexible GRS bridge approach was a good choice when the retaining wall was constructed on highly compressible foundation soils. • Field behavior of a GRS bridge approach with large settlement was investigated. • The settlement, vertical earth pressure and reinforcement strain were monitored. • The monitoring period was about 3 years, including the construction and service.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.12.007
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field behavior of a GRS bridge approach retaining wall on highly compressible foundation soils

Kui Gao, Kaifeng Zeng, Mengyuan Luo, Juntao Zhu et al.
2 citations
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.52
article

Field behavior of a GRS bridge approach retaining wall on highly compressible foundation soils

Kui Gao, Kaifeng Zeng, Mengyuan Luo, Juntao Zhu, Huabei Liu, Chunhai Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To reveal the behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) bridge approach retaining walls on highly compressible foundation soils, in this study, a GRS bridge approach adjacent to the Yangtze River was monitored for approximately 3 years during construction and post-construction. The settlement of the GRS bridge approach, the vertical earth pressure at the base of the backfill soil, and the reinforcement deformation were monitored. The monitoring points were arranged on the left and right sides of a cross-section and a longitudinal section at the mid-span. The results showed that the settlement of the GRS bridge approach was large and uneven, and the settlement rates were influenced by the water level of the Yangtze River. Due to the large and differential settlement , the distributions of the vertical earth pressure and geogrid reinforcement strain for a retaining wall constructed on highly compressible foundation soils were different from those for a retaining wall constructed on stable foundation soils. The overall GRS bridge approach performed well with large settlements, with only some minor structural problems in the facing of the retaining wall. This indicated that the flexible GRS bridge approach was a good choice when the retaining wall was constructed on highly compressible foundation soils. • Field behavior of a GRS bridge approach with large settlement was investigated. • The settlement, vertical earth pressure and reinforcement strain were monitored. • The monitoring period was about 3 years, including the construction and service.

Geotextiles and GeomembranesVol. 53(2)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Wuhan Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute (CN), CCCC Wuhan Harbour Engineering Design and Research (China) (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.