Book Review

Concerns about the state and definition of jazz have been circulating in scholarly and popular discourse for many decades.In Learning Jazz: Jazz Education, History, and Public Pedagogy, Ken Prouty examines how jazz stays relevant by analyzing a network of formal and informal spaces where people learn about the music.In addition to studying the history of institutionalized jazz education, Prouty uncovers other important educational discourses in early pedagogical publications of the 1920s, in less canonical-and sometimes altogether lostvoices in jazz's history, and in more mainstream contemporary media such as film and X accounts."Jazz learning," as he calls it, shapes and continually reworks different yet equally valuable understandings of the music's essential character.Thoroughly researched and often highly original, Learning Jazz comprises five chapters organized chronologically from the music's "nascent pedagogical discourse" to the twenty-first century's more public forms of musicological mass media (12).Drawing on his experience as a trombonist, Prouty first analyzes early jazz trombone method books in chapter one, "To Jazz, or Not to Jazz"in particular, the role of the glissando and other novelty effects in defining jazz as a stylistic approach instead of a genre.He addresses this body of work in great detail, scrutinizing publications by Henry Fillmore, Mayhew Lake, and Fortunato Sordillo in 1919 and those published by well-known jazz trombonists Miff Mole, Glenn Miller, and Tommy Dorsey, who capitalized on their popular recordings with instructional manuals in the mid-to-late 1920s.Prouty's extensive primary source analysis demonstrates how the standardization of musical language, terminology, and even book covers communicate varied conceptions of the genre at a time when there was not yet a general consensus on how to define jazz.In chapter two, "We Don't Know What We Don't Know," Prouty turns to jazz history's so-called "lost voices."Drawing on Sherrie Tucker's feminist challenge to the exclusion of women musicians from history, Prouty demonstrates how historiographical choices can reflect an unspoken bias

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Jazz Studies
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14713/jjs.v15i2.313
Primary Topic
Diverse Music Education Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Book Review

Fumi Tomita
Journal of Jazz Studies
Diverse Music Education Insights
article

Book Review

Fumi Tomita
article en

Abstract

Concerns about the state and definition of jazz have been circulating in scholarly and popular discourse for many decades.In Learning Jazz: Jazz Education, History, and Public Pedagogy, Ken Prouty examines how jazz stays relevant by analyzing a network of formal and informal spaces where people learn about the music.In addition to studying the history of institutionalized jazz education, Prouty uncovers other important educational discourses in early pedagogical publications of the 1920s, in less canonical-and sometimes altogether lostvoices in jazz's history, and in more mainstream contemporary media such as film and X accounts."Jazz learning," as he calls it, shapes and continually reworks different yet equally valuable understandings of the music's essential character.Thoroughly researched and often highly original, Learning Jazz comprises five chapters organized chronologically from the music's "nascent pedagogical discourse" to the twenty-first century's more public forms of musicological mass media (12).Drawing on his experience as a trombonist, Prouty first analyzes early jazz trombone method books in chapter one, "To Jazz, or Not to Jazz"in particular, the role of the glissando and other novelty effects in defining jazz as a stylistic approach instead of a genre.He addresses this body of work in great detail, scrutinizing publications by Henry Fillmore, Mayhew Lake, and Fortunato Sordillo in 1919 and those published by well-known jazz trombonists Miff Mole, Glenn Miller, and Tommy Dorsey, who capitalized on their popular recordings with instructional manuals in the mid-to-late 1920s.Prouty's extensive primary source analysis demonstrates how the standardization of musical language, terminology, and even book covers communicate varied conceptions of the genre at a time when there was not yet a general consensus on how to define jazz.In chapter two, "We Don't Know What We Don't Know," Prouty turns to jazz history's so-called "lost voices."Drawing on Sherrie Tucker's feminist challenge to the exclusion of women musicians from history, Prouty demonstrates how historiographical choices can reflect an unspoken bias

Journal of Jazz StudiesVol. 15(2)
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diverse Music Education Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.