Trade-off between computation time and solution quality for integrated generation and transmission expansion planning with N-1 security criterion

• Alternative formulations for integrated G&T expansion planning. • Trade-off between quality of solution and computational effort. • Consider uncertainties (on hydro and VRE production) • Use DC power flow on the network. • Include N-1 security criterion during G&T expansion planning. The generation and transmission (G&T) expansion planning of large-scale systems is usually carried out hierarchically due to the high complexity of the problem. However, this hierarchical plan may be more expensive than a fully integrated (co-optimized) G&T plan that, on the other hand, requires high computation time. Therefore, the trade-off between computation time and solution quality is of great importance, especially with the integration of renewable generation. This paper proposes and assesses alternative formulations of the integrated G&T planning problem, also considering the system operation simulation under the N-1 security criterion, seeking to balance solution optimality and computational effort. The assessments are illustrated for the Chilean electrical system. The main outcome is that one of the proposed methods, in which the future cost function is maintained fixed during the generation and transmission optimization and is recalculated only in the final simulation of the system operation, achieves results very close to the fully integrated generation, transmission, and operation optimization method. This method presents a cost reduction of 8 % compared to a hierarchical approach, which represents savings of around 700 million dollars, and 50 % less computation time compared to the fully integrated method. For the same proposed method, the preliminary calculation of an optimal solution without applying the N-1 security constraint as a starting point, followed by re-optimization with active N-1 security constraints, contributes to a 65 % reduction of the computation time without significantly impacting the quality of the solution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110444
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electric Power System Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade-off between computation time and solution quality for integrated generation and transmission expansion planning with N-1 security criterion

Gianfranco Chicco, Lucas Okamura, Carmen L.T. Borges
1 citations
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Electric Power System Optimization
0.21
article

Trade-off between computation time and solution quality for integrated generation and transmission expansion planning with N-1 security criterion

Gianfranco Chicco, Lucas Okamura, Carmen L.T. Borges
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Alternative formulations for integrated G&T expansion planning. • Trade-off between quality of solution and computational effort. • Consider uncertainties (on hydro and VRE production) • Use DC power flow on the network. • Include N-1 security criterion during G&T expansion planning. The generation and transmission (G&T) expansion planning of large-scale systems is usually carried out hierarchically due to the high complexity of the problem. However, this hierarchical plan may be more expensive than a fully integrated (co-optimized) G&T plan that, on the other hand, requires high computation time. Therefore, the trade-off between computation time and solution quality is of great importance, especially with the integration of renewable generation. This paper proposes and assesses alternative formulations of the integrated G&T planning problem, also considering the system operation simulation under the N-1 security criterion, seeking to balance solution optimality and computational effort. The assessments are illustrated for the Chilean electrical system. The main outcome is that one of the proposed methods, in which the future cost function is maintained fixed during the generation and transmission optimization and is recalculated only in the final simulation of the system operation, achieves results very close to the fully integrated generation, transmission, and operation optimization method. This method presents a cost reduction of 8 % compared to a hierarchical approach, which represents savings of around 700 million dollars, and 50 % less computation time compared to the fully integrated method. For the same proposed method, the preliminary calculation of an optimal solution without applying the N-1 security constraint as a starting point, followed by re-optimization with active N-1 security constraints, contributes to a 65 % reduction of the computation time without significantly impacting the quality of the solution.

International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy SystemsVol. 164
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Electric Power System Optimization
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.