Technical, economic, and environmental assessment of CO₂ ship transport in carbon capture and storage

CO<sub>2</sub> shipping is integral to expediting the implementation Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) initiatives within the United Kingdom. This study introduces a framework, encompassing techno-economic and environmental aspects, evaluating the maritime transportation of approximately 5.9 million tons of CO<sub>2</sub> annually from the Solent region, equivalent to removing around 1.3 million cars from the roads. The assessment covers carbon capture, liquefaction, maritime transport, energy utilization, and storage processes. The results highlight the significance of achieving economies of scale to enhance the cost-effectiveness of CCUS by maritime transport. Comparing vessels of two sizes, medium pressure and low pressure, the low-pressure vessel demonstrates superior cost-effectiveness and operational efficiency per unit of cargo. The Life Cycle Cost (LCC) analysis indicates that liquefaction (∼£20) and transportation (∼£19) account for around 73% of total costs. Strategies such as incorporating incentives in port dues could reduce transportation costs to around £13 per ton. Additionally, offering incentives for using renewable energy electricity can mitigate costs and environmental impact in the liquefaction process. Carbon capture technology and port-related expenses contributed around £13 and £1, respectively. The emission trading scheme significantly reduces LCC (by 69%) among all scenarios, emphasizing the need to increase carbon pricing beyond around £84 for low-pressure vessels and £118 for medium-pressure vessels to enhance competitiveness. However, the sensitivity analysis in each scenario reveals that electricity prices and the discount rate are key drivers influencing both the LCC and NPC of CO₂ transport projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123919
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical, economic, and environmental assessment of CO₂ ship transport in carbon capture and storage

Lindsay‐Marie Armstrong, Seyedvahid Vakili, Stephen R. Turnock, D.A.H. Teagle et al.
22 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
28.58
article

Technical, economic, and environmental assessment of CO₂ ship transport in carbon capture and storage

Lindsay‐Marie Armstrong, Seyedvahid Vakili, Stephen R. Turnock, D.A.H. Teagle, Panos Manias
article en
22 citations

Abstract

CO<sub>2</sub> shipping is integral to expediting the implementation Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) initiatives within the United Kingdom. This study introduces a framework, encompassing techno-economic and environmental aspects, evaluating the maritime transportation of approximately 5.9 million tons of CO<sub>2</sub> annually from the Solent region, equivalent to removing around 1.3 million cars from the roads. The assessment covers carbon capture, liquefaction, maritime transport, energy utilization, and storage processes. The results highlight the significance of achieving economies of scale to enhance the cost-effectiveness of CCUS by maritime transport. Comparing vessels of two sizes, medium pressure and low pressure, the low-pressure vessel demonstrates superior cost-effectiveness and operational efficiency per unit of cargo. The Life Cycle Cost (LCC) analysis indicates that liquefaction (∼£20) and transportation (∼£19) account for around 73% of total costs. Strategies such as incorporating incentives in port dues could reduce transportation costs to around £13 per ton. Additionally, offering incentives for using renewable energy electricity can mitigate costs and environmental impact in the liquefaction process. Carbon capture technology and port-related expenses contributed around £13 and £1, respectively. The emission trading scheme significantly reduces LCC (by 69%) among all scenarios, emphasizing the need to increase carbon pricing beyond around £84 for low-pressure vessels and £118 for medium-pressure vessels to enhance competitiveness. However, the sensitivity analysis in each scenario reveals that electricity prices and the discount rate are key drivers influencing both the LCC and NPC of CO₂ transport projects.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 373
National Oceanography Centre (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, University of Southampton, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
28.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.