‘6.5 sounds a bit better than 6.0?’: a case for embedding language assessment literacy in university teaching staff professional development

Language test scores are often used as one of the entry requirements for university admission, but perceptions of university teaching staff about students’ language proficiency (including those based on test scores) can have far-reaching impact beyond admissions selection – in teaching, learning and assessment. This paper explores what aspects of test score interpretation and use might be useful to embed in professional development for university teaching staff, an emergent theme from a multiple case study involving interviews with admissions personnel in six university admissions contexts. The analysis identified the need to further develop knowledge about the meaning of language test scores and the limits of inferences based on such scores, as well as an appreciation of the complex relationship between language proficiency and academic literacy. We conclude by envisioning an agenda for research and engagement embedding language assessment literacy in professional development programmes for university teaching staff.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2439854
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘6.5 sounds a bit better than 6.0?’: a case for embedding language assessment literacy in university teaching staff professional development

Angela Gayton, Daniel M. K. Lam
1 citations
Higher Education Research & Development
Second Language Learning and Teaching
3.91
article

‘6.5 sounds a bit better than 6.0?’: a case for embedding language assessment literacy in university teaching staff professional development

Angela Gayton, Daniel M. K. Lam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Language test scores are often used as one of the entry requirements for university admission, but perceptions of university teaching staff about students’ language proficiency (including those based on test scores) can have far-reaching impact beyond admissions selection – in teaching, learning and assessment. This paper explores what aspects of test score interpretation and use might be useful to embed in professional development for university teaching staff, an emergent theme from a multiple case study involving interviews with admissions personnel in six university admissions contexts. The analysis identified the need to further develop knowledge about the meaning of language test scores and the limits of inferences based on such scores, as well as an appreciation of the complex relationship between language proficiency and academic literacy. We conclude by envisioning an agenda for research and engagement embedding language assessment literacy in professional development programmes for university teaching staff.

Higher Education Research & DevelopmentVol. 44(4)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.