Identification of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Predicting Peripheral Arterial Disease Prognosis in Patients with Diabetes

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is known to be strongly linked to major adverse limb events, ultimately leading to an increased risk of limb-threatening conditions. We developed a predictive model using five identified biomarkers to predict major adverse limb events, limb loss, diabetic (DM) foot ulcers, and vascular intervention in patients with underlying PAD and DM over 2 years. Methods: A single-center prospective case control study with was conducted with 2 years’ follow up. In the discovery phase the cohort was randomly split into a 70:30 ratio, and proteins with a higher mean level of expression in the DM PAD group compared to the DM non-PAD group were identified. Next, a random forest model was trained using (1) clinical characteristics, (2) a five-protein panel, and (3) clinical characteristics combined with the five-protein panel. Demographic data were analyzed by independent t-test and chi-square test. The importance of predictive features was calculated using the variable importance (gain) score. The model was used and assessed for its ability to diagnose PAD, predict limb loss, predict major adverse limb events (MALEs), predict diabetic foot ulcers, and predict the need for vascular surgery. The model was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and net reclassification index. Results: The cohort of 392 patients was matched for age, sex, and comorbidities. Five proteins were identified (TNFa: tumor necrosis factor alpha, BMP-10: bone morphogenic protein 10, CCL15/MIP1 delta: chemokine (c-c motif) ligand 15/macrophage inflammatory protein 1 delta, MMP-10: matrix metalloprotease 10, and HTRA2/Omi: HTRA2, also known as Omi) as having a significantly higher level of expression in the DM PAD group. HTRA/Omi had the highest contribution to the model’s ability to diagnose PAD in diabetic patients. Model performance was best when combined with clinical characteristics to predict limb loss (AUROC 0.86, 0.76, 0.80), foot ulcer (AUROC 0.87, 0.82, 0.67), MALE (AUROC 0.81, 0.78, 0.67), and the need for vascular surgery (AUROC 0.82, 0.81, 0.61). Conclusions: In this study, we describe a biomarker panel that can be used in combination with clinical characteristics to create an accurate prediction model for diagnosis and prognostication of PAD in the setting of DM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetology
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology6010002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Predicting Peripheral Arterial Disease Prognosis in Patients with Diabetes

Batool Abuhalimeh, Mohammad Qadura, Kian Draper, Rawand Abdin et al.
2 citations
Diabetology
Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
0.48
article

Identification of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Predicting Peripheral Arterial Disease Prognosis in Patients with Diabetes

Batool Abuhalimeh, Mohammad Qadura, Kian Draper, Rawand Abdin, Muzammil H. Syed, Khalid Rasheed, Abdelrahman Zamzam, Ben Li, Houssam Younes, Farah Shaikh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is known to be strongly linked to major adverse limb events, ultimately leading to an increased risk of limb-threatening conditions. We developed a predictive model using five identified biomarkers to predict major adverse limb events, limb loss, diabetic (DM) foot ulcers, and vascular intervention in patients with underlying PAD and DM over 2 years. Methods: A single-center prospective case control study with was conducted with 2 years’ follow up. In the discovery phase the cohort was randomly split into a 70:30 ratio, and proteins with a higher mean level of expression in the DM PAD group compared to the DM non-PAD group were identified. Next, a random forest model was trained using (1) clinical characteristics, (2) a five-protein panel, and (3) clinical characteristics combined with the five-protein panel. Demographic data were analyzed by independent t-test and chi-square test. The importance of predictive features was calculated using the variable importance (gain) score. The model was used and assessed for its ability to diagnose PAD, predict limb loss, predict major adverse limb events (MALEs), predict diabetic foot ulcers, and predict the need for vascular surgery. The model was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and net reclassification index. Results: The cohort of 392 patients was matched for age, sex, and comorbidities. Five proteins were identified (TNFa: tumor necrosis factor alpha, BMP-10: bone morphogenic protein 10, CCL15/MIP1 delta: chemokine (c-c motif) ligand 15/macrophage inflammatory protein 1 delta, MMP-10: matrix metalloprotease 10, and HTRA2/Omi: HTRA2, also known as Omi) as having a significantly higher level of expression in the DM PAD group. HTRA/Omi had the highest contribution to the model’s ability to diagnose PAD in diabetic patients. Model performance was best when combined with clinical characteristics to predict limb loss (AUROC 0.86, 0.76, 0.80), foot ulcer (AUROC 0.87, 0.82, 0.67), MALE (AUROC 0.81, 0.78, 0.67), and the need for vascular surgery (AUROC 0.82, 0.81, 0.61). Conclusions: In this study, we describe a biomarker panel that can be used in combination with clinical characteristics to create an accurate prediction model for diagnosis and prognostication of PAD in the setting of DM.

DiabetologyVol. 6(1)
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Abu Dhabi Health Services (AE), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
0.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.