Analyzing financial development's moderating role on the investment-environmental quality nexus: Evidence from Australia using Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach

Understanding the impact channels of financial development on environmental quality is vital for achieving desired environmental targets. While the direct impact of financial development on environmental quality has been extensively addressed, its indirect channel through investment has not been broadly explored. Thus, how financial development moderates the impact of domestic investments and foreign direct investments on environment can be an important research agenda. Therefore, this research purposes to study whether financial development moderates the impact of investments on environmental quality in Australia for the period from 1980 to 2021 using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model. The key findings emphasize that financial development degrades environmental quality in Australia. Moreover, foreign direct investments have a positive effect on environmental quality, confirming the validity of the Pollution Halo Hypothesis in Australia. In contrast, domestic investments worsen environmental quality. Additionally, financial development does not mitigate the harmful impact of domestic investments on environmental quality. However, financial development plays a neutral role in moderating the impact of foreign direct investments on environmental quality while moderating the impact of domestic investment-environmetal quality relationship. These empirical findings provide diverse policy implications for ensuring environmental quality in Australia by strategically supporting both foreign and domestic investments. • Financial development and domestic investments contribute to the deterioration of environmental health in Australia. • Foreign direct investments enhance environmental quality. • Financial development does not moderate the nexus between foreign direct investment and environmental quality. • Financial development positively moderates the relationship between domestic investment and environmental quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100568
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing financial development's moderating role on the investment-environmental quality nexus: Evidence from Australia using Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach

Tapan Sarker, Mohammad Mafizur Rahman, Ambepitiya Wijethunga Gamage Champa Nilanthi Wijethunga
5 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
5.65
article

Analyzing financial development's moderating role on the investment-environmental quality nexus: Evidence from Australia using Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach

Tapan Sarker, Mohammad Mafizur Rahman, Ambepitiya Wijethunga Gamage Champa Nilanthi Wijethunga
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Understanding the impact channels of financial development on environmental quality is vital for achieving desired environmental targets. While the direct impact of financial development on environmental quality has been extensively addressed, its indirect channel through investment has not been broadly explored. Thus, how financial development moderates the impact of domestic investments and foreign direct investments on environment can be an important research agenda. Therefore, this research purposes to study whether financial development moderates the impact of investments on environmental quality in Australia for the period from 1980 to 2021 using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model. The key findings emphasize that financial development degrades environmental quality in Australia. Moreover, foreign direct investments have a positive effect on environmental quality, confirming the validity of the Pollution Halo Hypothesis in Australia. In contrast, domestic investments worsen environmental quality. Additionally, financial development does not mitigate the harmful impact of domestic investments on environmental quality. However, financial development plays a neutral role in moderating the impact of foreign direct investments on environmental quality while moderating the impact of domestic investment-environmetal quality relationship. These empirical findings provide diverse policy implications for ensuring environmental quality in Australia by strategically supporting both foreign and domestic investments. • Financial development and domestic investments contribute to the deterioration of environmental health in Australia. • Foreign direct investments enhance environmental quality. • Financial development does not moderate the nexus between foreign direct investment and environmental quality. • Financial development positively moderates the relationship between domestic investment and environmental quality.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 25
University of Southern Queensland (AU), Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka (LK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.