Development of Electric Vehicle Accidents Attitude Scale in Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Dimensions: A Reliability and Validity Study

Abstract Background/aim: The knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of healthcare professionals are directly related to mortality and morbidity due to traffic accidents. It has become important to investigate the causes of different injuries in electric vehicle accidents. These issues are indirectly the responsibility of forensic medicine. The aim of this study was to develop an Electric Vehicle Accidents Attitude Scale (EVAAS) regarding cognitive, affective and behavioral dimensions to determine the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards electric vehicle accidents. Materials and methods: The sample group of the study consisted of 386 physicians and other health workers, working in the emergency services and 112 units of hospitals in Türkiye. The Delphi technique was applied in the development of EVAAS, and validity/reliability analyzes were conducted after focus group study and pilot application. Results: The 26-item EVAAS scale was grouped under 3 dimensions-factor- (cognitive, affective, and behavioral) explaining 65.257% of the total variance. Cronbach's Alpha coefficient for EVAAS was 0.859, retest reliability was 0.781, and the test-retest reliability was calculated as 0.766. Conclusion: A valid and reliable EVAAS scale consisting of 26 items in three dimensions: cognitive, affective and behavioral was developed in the study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genel Tıp Dergisi
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1519434
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Electric Vehicle Accidents Attitude Scale in Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Dimensions: A Reliability and Validity Study

Şerife Özdinç, İbrahim Kılıç, Zafer Liman, Uğur Kayhan
1 citations
Genel Tıp Dergisi
Occupational Health and Safety Research
0.45
article

Development of Electric Vehicle Accidents Attitude Scale in Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Dimensions: A Reliability and Validity Study

Şerife Özdinç, İbrahim Kılıç, Zafer Liman, Uğur Kayhan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background/aim: The knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of healthcare professionals are directly related to mortality and morbidity due to traffic accidents. It has become important to investigate the causes of different injuries in electric vehicle accidents. These issues are indirectly the responsibility of forensic medicine. The aim of this study was to develop an Electric Vehicle Accidents Attitude Scale (EVAAS) regarding cognitive, affective and behavioral dimensions to determine the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards electric vehicle accidents. Materials and methods: The sample group of the study consisted of 386 physicians and other health workers, working in the emergency services and 112 units of hospitals in Türkiye. The Delphi technique was applied in the development of EVAAS, and validity/reliability analyzes were conducted after focus group study and pilot application. Results: The 26-item EVAAS scale was grouped under 3 dimensions-factor- (cognitive, affective, and behavioral) explaining 65.257% of the total variance. Cronbach's Alpha coefficient for EVAAS was 0.859, retest reliability was 0.781, and the test-retest reliability was calculated as 0.766. Conclusion: A valid and reliable EVAAS scale consisting of 26 items in three dimensions: cognitive, affective and behavioral was developed in the study.

Genel Tıp DergisiVol. 34(6)
Karabük University (TR), Universidad CES (CO), Yüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi (TR), Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Afyon Kocatepe University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
0.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.