Introducing a New Corpus of Definitive M&A Agreements, 2000–2020

ABSTRACT Contract design and architecture is an important topic within economics, finance, and law. However, attempts to study it are significantly constrained by the limited availability of public, high quality data. In this paper, we introduce a new corpus of 7929 Definitive Merger Agreements submitted to the SEC between 2000 and 2020 involving a transaction in excess of $100 million. Through a combination of machine learning and human evaluation, we associate these agreements with other metadata, such as deal size, industry classification, and advising law firms. In addition, we identify and make available the text of individual clauses contained in these agreements. In a final step, we provide an illustration of how these data can be used to generate novel insights into M&A contract design and drafting practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12410
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introducing a New Corpus of Definitive M&A Agreements, 2000–2020

Eric L. Talley, Julian Nyarko, Matthew Jennejohn, Peter Adelson
1 citations
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
1.13
article

Introducing a New Corpus of Definitive M&A Agreements, 2000–2020

Eric L. Talley, Julian Nyarko, Matthew Jennejohn, Peter Adelson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Contract design and architecture is an important topic within economics, finance, and law. However, attempts to study it are significantly constrained by the limited availability of public, high quality data. In this paper, we introduce a new corpus of 7929 Definitive Merger Agreements submitted to the SEC between 2000 and 2020 involving a transaction in excess of $100 million. Through a combination of machine learning and human evaluation, we associate these agreements with other metadata, such as deal size, industry classification, and advising law firms. In addition, we identify and make available the text of individual clauses contained in these agreements. In a final step, we provide an illustration of how these data can be used to generate novel insights into M&A contract design and drafting practices.

Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesVol. 22(1)
Brigham Young University (US), United States Department of Defense (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), Columbia University (US), Stanford University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Introducing a New Corpus of Definitive M&A Agreements, 2000–2020 — Eric L. Talley, Julian Nyarko, et al. · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS