Unveiling the Gender Nuances of Wisdom in Negotiation: An Experimental Analysis through Negotiation Game

Negotiation is a fundamental part of daily life, serving as a key tool for achieving success across various domains. This study shifts the focus from merely successful negotiation to the concept of "wise negotiation.’ Central to this exploration is the investigation of gender differences in both the practice and conceptualization of wise negotiation. This study's novelty lies in distinguishing wise negotiation from traditional notions of success, revealing nuanced gender-specific approaches within a specialized cohort of recognized negotiators. Using a mixed-method research design, the study gathered implicit and explicit data from 20 women and 31 men, all recognized by peers for their qualities as wise negotiators. Data collection included interviews, negotiation tasks, and questionnaires, analyzed through both qualitative and quantitative methods. Findings revealed distinct gendered perspectives on wise negotiation. Implicit data showed that women often approached wise negotiation as a relational and holistic endeavor, prioritizing the well-being of all parties. Men, however, tended to adopt a more pragmatic view, focusing on efficiency and practical outcomes. Explicit data from questionnaires further highlighted gender disparities. A Mann-Whitney U test identified significant differences in wisdom-related variables, such as openness, emotionality, adaptive performance through training and learning, and emotional management. Notably, no gender differences emerged in a negotiation simulation task. Examining gendered views of negotiation is particularly critical because gender shapes interpersonal dynamics, communication styles, and decision-making processes more profoundly than many other demographic variables. Understanding these differences is essential for developing inclusive strategies that transcend stereotypes, ensuring equitable participation and outcomes. Women emphasized relational dynamics, while men leaned toward practicalities, suggesting a divergence from traditional gender roles. These insights can inform the development of gender-inclusive policies and training programs that cultivate wisdom in negotiation, fostering a balanced and equitable approach across diverse contexts. This focus on gendered nuances enriches our understanding of wise negotiation and its potential applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of experimental research and review
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2024.v46.012
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the Gender Nuances of Wisdom in Negotiation: An Experimental Analysis through Negotiation Game

Prarthana Saikia, Ankita Sharma
1 citations
International Journal of experimental research and review
Conflict Management and Negotiation
1.13
article

Unveiling the Gender Nuances of Wisdom in Negotiation: An Experimental Analysis through Negotiation Game

Prarthana Saikia, Ankita Sharma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Negotiation is a fundamental part of daily life, serving as a key tool for achieving success across various domains. This study shifts the focus from merely successful negotiation to the concept of "wise negotiation.’ Central to this exploration is the investigation of gender differences in both the practice and conceptualization of wise negotiation. This study's novelty lies in distinguishing wise negotiation from traditional notions of success, revealing nuanced gender-specific approaches within a specialized cohort of recognized negotiators. Using a mixed-method research design, the study gathered implicit and explicit data from 20 women and 31 men, all recognized by peers for their qualities as wise negotiators. Data collection included interviews, negotiation tasks, and questionnaires, analyzed through both qualitative and quantitative methods. Findings revealed distinct gendered perspectives on wise negotiation. Implicit data showed that women often approached wise negotiation as a relational and holistic endeavor, prioritizing the well-being of all parties. Men, however, tended to adopt a more pragmatic view, focusing on efficiency and practical outcomes. Explicit data from questionnaires further highlighted gender disparities. A Mann-Whitney U test identified significant differences in wisdom-related variables, such as openness, emotionality, adaptive performance through training and learning, and emotional management. Notably, no gender differences emerged in a negotiation simulation task. Examining gendered views of negotiation is particularly critical because gender shapes interpersonal dynamics, communication styles, and decision-making processes more profoundly than many other demographic variables. Understanding these differences is essential for developing inclusive strategies that transcend stereotypes, ensuring equitable participation and outcomes. Women emphasized relational dynamics, while men leaned toward practicalities, suggesting a divergence from traditional gender roles. These insights can inform the development of gender-inclusive policies and training programs that cultivate wisdom in negotiation, fostering a balanced and equitable approach across diverse contexts. This focus on gendered nuances enriches our understanding of wise negotiation and its potential applications.

International Journal of experimental research and reviewVol. 46
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur (IN)
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.