Students perspectives on proctoring mobile applications for assessments: the case of South Africa

This paper analysed student's perceptions on use of a mobile proctoring application (app).The study used case of South Africa where few universities were using a proctoring mobile application called The Invigilator.Using constructs from mobile app rating scale (MARS), users' views from app stores, reports and online news articles were thematically analysed.The findings showed that the mobile proctoring app had strengths in app classification, aesthetic and information.However, there were problems with functionality and subjectivity quality.Users reported technical problems during online assessments when using the app, e.g., limited technical support and delays in feedback.The problems were hindering users to complete online assessments and could affect their academic performance.The findings are useful for academics and administrators who are considering mobile proctoring to improve academic integrity of online and remote assessments.The study contributes towards literature on proctoring mobile apps and academic integrity of assessments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtel.2025.143511
Primary Topic
Mobile Learning in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students perspectives on proctoring mobile applications for assessments: the case of South Africa

Frank Makoza
International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning
Mobile Learning in Education
article

Students perspectives on proctoring mobile applications for assessments: the case of South Africa

Frank Makoza
article en

Abstract

This paper analysed student's perceptions on use of a mobile proctoring application (app).The study used case of South Africa where few universities were using a proctoring mobile application called The Invigilator.Using constructs from mobile app rating scale (MARS), users' views from app stores, reports and online news articles were thematically analysed.The findings showed that the mobile proctoring app had strengths in app classification, aesthetic and information.However, there were problems with functionality and subjectivity quality.Users reported technical problems during online assessments when using the app, e.g., limited technical support and delays in feedback.The problems were hindering users to complete online assessments and could affect their academic performance.The findings are useful for academics and administrators who are considering mobile proctoring to improve academic integrity of online and remote assessments.The study contributes towards literature on proctoring mobile apps and academic integrity of assessments.

International Journal of Technology Enhanced LearningVol. 17(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Mobile Learning in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Students perspectives on proctoring mobile applications for assessments: the case of South Africa — Frank Makoza · International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS