Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Provides Durable Outcomes Regardless of Diagnosis and Pathology

Introduction As surgical indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have expanded, appropriate patient counseling and shared decision-making should be informed by clinical outcomes specific to each indication for RSA. While RSA has traditionally been indicated in patients with rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA), it has been employed increasingly in patients with osteoarthritis and in intact rotator cuff with better-reported outcomes. To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and postoperative range of motion (ROM) following RSA for patients with RCA compared to those with rotator cuff-intact glenohumeral OA. Methods All patients undergoing RSA from January 2016 to September 2021 by a single surgeon at a single institution were retrospectively identified through a prospectively collected database. Patients indicated for RSA secondary to OA without rotator cuff pathology were compared to patients indicated for RSA secondary to RCA. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart (SAS) score, and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) scores, as well as active range of motion (ROM) were measured preoperatively and at a minimum 2-year follow-up, with outcomes between groups based on RSA indication compared. Results A total of 107 patients (n=71 RCA group, n=36 OA group) were identified, with no difference in patient demographics. No significant differences between groups were appreciated at the final follow-up based on SST (p = 0.765), ASES (p = 0.437), SAS (p=0.782), or UCLA (p = 0.313) scores, or ROM (all, p<0.622). One patient (2.8%) in the OA group underwent revision surgery due to dislocation, while one patient (1.4%) in the RCA group required revision due to an infection associated with the spacer. Conclusion Patients undergoing RSA for glenohumeral OA without rotator cuff pathology reported comparable patient reports outcomes and ROM values at a minimum 2-year follow-up compared to patients indicated for RSA secondary to RCA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.124071
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Provides Durable Outcomes Regardless of Diagnosis and Pathology

Hans Lapica, Howard Routman, Nino Coutelle, Garrett R. Jackson et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Provides Durable Outcomes Regardless of Diagnosis and Pathology

Hans Lapica, Howard Routman, Nino Coutelle, Garrett R. Jackson, Colton C. Mowers, Derrick M. Knapik, Vani J. Sabesan, Aghdas Movassaghi
article en

Abstract

Introduction As surgical indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have expanded, appropriate patient counseling and shared decision-making should be informed by clinical outcomes specific to each indication for RSA. While RSA has traditionally been indicated in patients with rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA), it has been employed increasingly in patients with osteoarthritis and in intact rotator cuff with better-reported outcomes. To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and postoperative range of motion (ROM) following RSA for patients with RCA compared to those with rotator cuff-intact glenohumeral OA. Methods All patients undergoing RSA from January 2016 to September 2021 by a single surgeon at a single institution were retrospectively identified through a prospectively collected database. Patients indicated for RSA secondary to OA without rotator cuff pathology were compared to patients indicated for RSA secondary to RCA. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart (SAS) score, and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) scores, as well as active range of motion (ROM) were measured preoperatively and at a minimum 2-year follow-up, with outcomes between groups based on RSA indication compared. Results A total of 107 patients (n=71 RCA group, n=36 OA group) were identified, with no difference in patient demographics. No significant differences between groups were appreciated at the final follow-up based on SST (p = 0.765), ASES (p = 0.437), SAS (p=0.782), or UCLA (p = 0.313) scores, or ROM (all, p<0.622). One patient (2.8%) in the OA group underwent revision surgery due to dislocation, while one patient (1.4%) in the RCA group required revision due to an infection associated with the spacer. Conclusion Patients undergoing RSA for glenohumeral OA without rotator cuff pathology reported comparable patient reports outcomes and ROM values at a minimum 2-year follow-up compared to patients indicated for RSA secondary to RCA.

Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & InnovationVol. 5(2)
Rush University Medical Center (US), Orthopedic Center (US), Tucson Orthopaedic Institute (US), University of Missouri (US)
University of Miami, Wayne State University, Cleveland Clinic, School of Medicine, Indiana University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.