Online programs: Attrition risks differ between environmental science and natural resource master's non‐thesis students

Abstract Understanding attrition risks specific to online student populations is crucial for the long‐term success of online programs. Online programs allow place‐based working professionals access to education needed for professional development and career advancement. This study was conducted to determine if educational preparation, student characteristics, and internal educational factors could predict the probability of discontinuation from natural resource or environmental science disciplines in online non‐thesis master's programs. The Cox proportional hazards model survival analysis was used to examine longitudinal data from 2017 to 2023 and assess attrition risk over time, examined time as a factor of attrition behavior, and identified predictors of attrition from two online programs. Attrition risks varied between environmental science and master of natural resources online non‐thesis programs. In the natural resource program, a statistically significant relationship was found between student age, gender, race, degree background, undergraduate grade point average, cumulative grade point average, and time between degrees. A total of 70% of discontinued students did so within the first three terms, indicating the highest risk of attrition occurred early in both programs. Different attrition risks between programs warrant further examination to provide meaningful support specific to students’ needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural sciences education
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.70005
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online programs: Attrition risks differ between environmental science and natural resource master's non‐thesis students

Laura Holyoke, Steven Daley-Laursen, Elise Kokenge, Krista M. Soria et al.
Natural sciences education
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Online programs: Attrition risks differ between environmental science and natural resource master's non‐thesis students

Laura Holyoke, Steven Daley-Laursen, Elise Kokenge, Krista M. Soria, Leda N. Kobziar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding attrition risks specific to online student populations is crucial for the long‐term success of online programs. Online programs allow place‐based working professionals access to education needed for professional development and career advancement. This study was conducted to determine if educational preparation, student characteristics, and internal educational factors could predict the probability of discontinuation from natural resource or environmental science disciplines in online non‐thesis master's programs. The Cox proportional hazards model survival analysis was used to examine longitudinal data from 2017 to 2023 and assess attrition risk over time, examined time as a factor of attrition behavior, and identified predictors of attrition from two online programs. Attrition risks varied between environmental science and master of natural resources online non‐thesis programs. In the natural resource program, a statistically significant relationship was found between student age, gender, race, degree background, undergraduate grade point average, cumulative grade point average, and time between degrees. A total of 70% of discontinued students did so within the first three terms, indicating the highest risk of attrition occurred early in both programs. Different attrition risks between programs warrant further examination to provide meaningful support specific to students’ needs.

Natural sciences educationVol. 54(1)
University of Idaho (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.