Evaluating large language models for criterion-based grading from agreement to consistency

This study evaluates the ability of large language models (LLMs) to deliver criterion-based grading and examines the impact of prompt engineering with detailed criteria on grading. Using well-established human benchmarks and quantitative analyses, we found that even free LLMs achieve criterion-based grading with a detailed understanding of the criteria, underscoring the importance of domain-specific understanding over model complexity. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to deliver scalable educational feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Science of Learning
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00291-1
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating large language models for criterion-based grading from agreement to consistency

Da‐Wei Zhang, Melissa Boey, Alexis Hoh Sheng Jia, Yan Tan
17 citations
npj Science of Learning
Topic Modeling
5.91
article

Evaluating large language models for criterion-based grading from agreement to consistency

Da‐Wei Zhang, Melissa Boey, Alexis Hoh Sheng Jia, Yan Tan
article en
17 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the ability of large language models (LLMs) to deliver criterion-based grading and examines the impact of prompt engineering with detailed criteria on grading. Using well-established human benchmarks and quantitative analyses, we found that even free LLMs achieve criterion-based grading with a detailed understanding of the criteria, underscoring the importance of domain-specific understanding over model complexity. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to deliver scalable educational feedback.

npj Science of LearningVol. 9(1)
Monash University Malaysia (MY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Topic Modeling
5.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.