PHILOSOPHIC-ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A VIEW FROM 2024

The article focuses on philosophic-anthropological issues related to the development of artificial intelligence (AI). The author analyzes a set of possible positive and negative consequences of digitalization for humanity. In studying the dialectics of digital technology development, some novelty points concern an attempt to look at this complex process systematically, highlighting the anthropological aspects of this controversial development. In particular, there is an intention to understand how AI may affect the evolution of our consciousness and ethics, and how it correlates with human nature. The article mentions the AI's prominent achievements as on the beginning of 2024, demonstrating how advanced artificial intelligence has already opened up unique opportunities in fundamental and applied sciences. These impressive results give grounds to evaluate AI as a challenging technology, which questions traditional notions of what makes humans the most intelligent creatures on the planet. The development of AI is forcing us to rethink a number of ethical, psychological, and existential issues, including our place in the world and our relationship with smart technologies. The article emphasizes the ambivalent potential of the emerging digital technologies, which: can disrupt existing markets for labor, goods and services, and at the same time create new ones; can contribute to overcoming poverty and inequality, or exacerbate them in other ways; have the potential to serve humanistic goals, or to amplify processes of dehumanization when AI is integrated into new means of mass destruction or enslavement of humans. One of the important conclusions proposed in the article is that current AI-based technologies remain entirely within the anthropological paradigm: they do not (yet) have any self-interest that has not been built in by humans in advance. Therefore, the main source of danger comes from people, and the primary risks lie in attempts to instrumentalize AI by people to achieve some wrong and misguided goals. In the article, a call is made for a thorough study of the ethical and social implications of the large-scale deployment of digital technologies, in order to ensure their safe and responsible use. Among other things, a number of systemic measures are proposed that could contribute to effective public control over these innovative processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Мiждисциплiнарнi дослiдження складних систем
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31392/iscs.2024.24.057
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PHILOSOPHIC-ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A VIEW FROM 2024

Oleksandr Stovpets
Мiждисциплiнарнi дослiдження складних систем
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
article

PHILOSOPHIC-ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A VIEW FROM 2024

Oleksandr Stovpets
article en

Abstract

The article focuses on philosophic-anthropological issues related to the development of artificial intelligence (AI). The author analyzes a set of possible positive and negative consequences of digitalization for humanity. In studying the dialectics of digital technology development, some novelty points concern an attempt to look at this complex process systematically, highlighting the anthropological aspects of this controversial development. In particular, there is an intention to understand how AI may affect the evolution of our consciousness and ethics, and how it correlates with human nature. The article mentions the AI's prominent achievements as on the beginning of 2024, demonstrating how advanced artificial intelligence has already opened up unique opportunities in fundamental and applied sciences. These impressive results give grounds to evaluate AI as a challenging technology, which questions traditional notions of what makes humans the most intelligent creatures on the planet. The development of AI is forcing us to rethink a number of ethical, psychological, and existential issues, including our place in the world and our relationship with smart technologies. The article emphasizes the ambivalent potential of the emerging digital technologies, which: can disrupt existing markets for labor, goods and services, and at the same time create new ones; can contribute to overcoming poverty and inequality, or exacerbate them in other ways; have the potential to serve humanistic goals, or to amplify processes of dehumanization when AI is integrated into new means of mass destruction or enslavement of humans. One of the important conclusions proposed in the article is that current AI-based technologies remain entirely within the anthropological paradigm: they do not (yet) have any self-interest that has not been built in by humans in advance. Therefore, the main source of danger comes from people, and the primary risks lie in attempts to instrumentalize AI by people to achieve some wrong and misguided goals. In the article, a call is made for a thorough study of the ethical and social implications of the large-scale deployment of digital technologies, in order to ensure their safe and responsible use. Among other things, a number of systemic measures are proposed that could contribute to effective public control over these innovative processes.

Мiждисциплiнарнi дослiдження складних систем(24)
IQ Samhällsbyggnad (SE), Odessa National Maritime University (UA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.