Stainless steel crowns vs preformed zirconia crowns in primary teeth

Early childhood caries is a common chronic disease affecting children and often requires extensive restorative treatments. Stainless steel crowns (SSC) and preformed zirconia crowns (PZC) are two of the most widely used options in pediatric dentistry. SSC, introduced in 1950, are known for their durability, ease of placement, and low cost, although they have limited aesthetics due to their metallic appearance. In contrast, PZC offer an attractive aesthetic alternative, mimicking the natural tooth color, catering to the growing demand from parents for more aesthetic restorations. In terms of gingival health and plaque accumulation, PZC exhibit lower bacterial plaque adhesion and reduced gingival inflammation compared to SSC, due to their highly polished surface. Nevertheless, both options offer successful clinical outcomes in terms of longevity. Regarding retention, SSC excel in long-term stability and resistance, though PZC also demonstrate high retention rates, particularly during the first years of follow-up. However, PZC require greater tooth reduction for placement, which may compromise pulpal health and increase operative time. A critical aspect is the wear on opposing teeth, as PZC may cause slight wear, whereas SSC show less abrasion, making them more suitable for restorations in posterior sectors. Additionally, preparation time for PZC is longer since they do not allow adjustments after fabrication, unlike SSC. In conclusion, both crowns have advantages and disadvantages. The selection depends on clinical factors and the preferences of patients and their parents. SSC provide a durable and economical option, while PZC stand out for their aesthetics and gingival health benefits, albeit with higher costs and longer operative times.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2024.v10.i4d.2070
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stainless steel crowns vs preformed zirconia crowns in primary teeth

María Concepción Treviño-Tijerina, Norma Cruz Fierro, Julia Garza-Villarreal, Sara Sáenz-Rangel
1 citations
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Dental materials and restorations
0.40
article

Stainless steel crowns vs preformed zirconia crowns in primary teeth

María Concepción Treviño-Tijerina, Norma Cruz Fierro, Julia Garza-Villarreal, Sara Sáenz-Rangel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Early childhood caries is a common chronic disease affecting children and often requires extensive restorative treatments. Stainless steel crowns (SSC) and preformed zirconia crowns (PZC) are two of the most widely used options in pediatric dentistry. SSC, introduced in 1950, are known for their durability, ease of placement, and low cost, although they have limited aesthetics due to their metallic appearance. In contrast, PZC offer an attractive aesthetic alternative, mimicking the natural tooth color, catering to the growing demand from parents for more aesthetic restorations. In terms of gingival health and plaque accumulation, PZC exhibit lower bacterial plaque adhesion and reduced gingival inflammation compared to SSC, due to their highly polished surface. Nevertheless, both options offer successful clinical outcomes in terms of longevity. Regarding retention, SSC excel in long-term stability and resistance, though PZC also demonstrate high retention rates, particularly during the first years of follow-up. However, PZC require greater tooth reduction for placement, which may compromise pulpal health and increase operative time. A critical aspect is the wear on opposing teeth, as PZC may cause slight wear, whereas SSC show less abrasion, making them more suitable for restorations in posterior sectors. Additionally, preparation time for PZC is longer since they do not allow adjustments after fabrication, unlike SSC. In conclusion, both crowns have advantages and disadvantages. The selection depends on clinical factors and the preferences of patients and their parents. SSC provide a durable and economical option, while PZC stand out for their aesthetics and gingival health benefits, albeit with higher costs and longer operative times.

International Journal of Applied Dental SciencesVol. 10(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Dental materials and restorations
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.