Correction of maxillary hypoplasia with MSE (Maxillary Skeletal Expander) and facemask supported by mini-implants

Maxillary constriction is defined as a transverse deficiency of multifactorial etiology. The primary objective of the Maxillary Skeletal Expander II (MSEII) is to widen the maxilla by separating the midpalatal suture, maximizing skeletal expansion while minimizing dentoalveolar expansion. Facemask (FM) therapy stimulates anterior maxillary growth by applying traction forces directly to the bone via temporary anchorage devices (TADs) or dental anchorage. The combination of MSEII and FM has proven effective in correcting both transverse maxillary deficiencies and sagittal discrepancies in growing patients, particularly in Class III malocclusions, promoting forward maxillary projection. This case report presents a 12-year-old male patient with skeletal Class I malocclusion, a tendency toward Class III, and maxillary constriction. A combined approach using skeletal expansion with MSEII and FM was employed to correct the transverse maxillary deficiency and improve the sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible. During phase I of the treatment, mini-implants and TADs were placed, and the facemask was used for 14-16 hours daily for seven months. Following maxillary expansion and advancement, significant improvements were achieved in the facial profile, occlusal relationship, and dental alignment. Clinical results revealed a maxillary expansion of 7.5 mm, increased facial convexity, and alleviation of severe crowding. This therapeutic approach provided a stable and less invasive correction of the malocclusion, avoiding the need for future orthognathic surgery while enhancing both function and aesthetics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2024.v10.i4e.2080
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction of maxillary hypoplasia with MSE (Maxillary Skeletal Expander) and facemask supported by mini-implants

José Ignacio Aguilera Longoria, C. Varo Solís, Alfaro Orúe Sergio, DCF Martha Margarita Aguado Arzola et al.
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

Correction of maxillary hypoplasia with MSE (Maxillary Skeletal Expander) and facemask supported by mini-implants

José Ignacio Aguilera Longoria, C. Varo Solís, Alfaro Orúe Sergio, DCF Martha Margarita Aguado Arzola, Calderon Torres Fernando, Llanas Ramirez Guillermo, Valenzuela Rascón Fernando, Sarai Gómez Ochoa
article en

Abstract

Maxillary constriction is defined as a transverse deficiency of multifactorial etiology. The primary objective of the Maxillary Skeletal Expander II (MSEII) is to widen the maxilla by separating the midpalatal suture, maximizing skeletal expansion while minimizing dentoalveolar expansion. Facemask (FM) therapy stimulates anterior maxillary growth by applying traction forces directly to the bone via temporary anchorage devices (TADs) or dental anchorage. The combination of MSEII and FM has proven effective in correcting both transverse maxillary deficiencies and sagittal discrepancies in growing patients, particularly in Class III malocclusions, promoting forward maxillary projection. This case report presents a 12-year-old male patient with skeletal Class I malocclusion, a tendency toward Class III, and maxillary constriction. A combined approach using skeletal expansion with MSEII and FM was employed to correct the transverse maxillary deficiency and improve the sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible. During phase I of the treatment, mini-implants and TADs were placed, and the facemask was used for 14-16 hours daily for seven months. Following maxillary expansion and advancement, significant improvements were achieved in the facial profile, occlusal relationship, and dental alignment. Clinical results revealed a maxillary expansion of 7.5 mm, increased facial convexity, and alleviation of severe crowding. This therapeutic approach provided a stable and less invasive correction of the malocclusion, avoiding the need for future orthognathic surgery while enhancing both function and aesthetics.

International Journal of Applied Dental SciencesVol. 10(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.