Relation between nasofacial angle and nasomental angle: A study based on profilometric analysis

Background: Profilometric analysis is very useful while measuring the angles in the profile photographs. The benefit is that the profile analysis utilizes angular measurements, which are unaffected by image enlargement. This serves as a permanent record of the patients profile view and help in establishing the ideal aesthetic norms. The objective of this research was to determine the average values of the Nasofacial Angle and Nasomental Angle, which are the two significant nose angles that constitute a crucial component of Powell's aesthetic triangle. Methodology: Standardized profile photographs of 60 subjects in age group of 12-18 yrs, comprising 30 males and 30 females were taken in this research. Nasofacial Angle and Nasomental Angle were analyzed using an Imaging IC measure software. The profilometric analysis for these two angles was done on the profile photographs and the obtained values were tablulated in an Excel sheet and sent for statistical analysis. Results: IBM's SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 25.0 was employed to conduct the statistical tests. It was an unpaired student t test. The nasofacial angle (G-Pog/N-Nd) for Class I males (Mean=36.07) showed significant differences when compared with females (Mean=34.33).The Nasofacial Angle measurements significantly decreased across the genders, with notable variations. Nasomental Angle (N-Pn-Pog) in Class I males, (mean = 121.14) was significantly lower than those of females (Mean= 124.16). Overall, the results showed difference in facial convexity suggesting distinct facial developmental patterns. Conclusion: Males and females were found to differ in their nasofacial and nasomental angles. The mean values derived from this sample could be utilized for comparison, diagnosis, and treatment planning in orthodontics, dentistry, and plastic surgery. There is an inverse relationship between the two angles. The greater the Nasomental angle, the smaller the Nasofacial angle.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2024.v10.i4e.2079
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relation between nasofacial angle and nasomental angle: A study based on profilometric analysis

Faisal Arshad, Shwetha GS, Shashi Kumar Hc, Prashanth CS et al.
2 links
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

Relation between nasofacial angle and nasomental angle: A study based on profilometric analysis

Faisal Arshad, Shwetha GS, Shashi Kumar Hc, Prashanth CS, Amarnath BC
article en

Abstract

Background: Profilometric analysis is very useful while measuring the angles in the profile photographs. The benefit is that the profile analysis utilizes angular measurements, which are unaffected by image enlargement. This serves as a permanent record of the patients profile view and help in establishing the ideal aesthetic norms. The objective of this research was to determine the average values of the Nasofacial Angle and Nasomental Angle, which are the two significant nose angles that constitute a crucial component of Powell's aesthetic triangle. Methodology: Standardized profile photographs of 60 subjects in age group of 12-18 yrs, comprising 30 males and 30 females were taken in this research. Nasofacial Angle and Nasomental Angle were analyzed using an Imaging IC measure software. The profilometric analysis for these two angles was done on the profile photographs and the obtained values were tablulated in an Excel sheet and sent for statistical analysis. Results: IBM's SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 25.0 was employed to conduct the statistical tests. It was an unpaired student t test. The nasofacial angle (G-Pog/N-Nd) for Class I males (Mean=36.07) showed significant differences when compared with females (Mean=34.33).The Nasofacial Angle measurements significantly decreased across the genders, with notable variations. Nasomental Angle (N-Pn-Pog) in Class I males, (mean = 121.14) was significantly lower than those of females (Mean= 124.16). Overall, the results showed difference in facial convexity suggesting distinct facial developmental patterns. Conclusion: Males and females were found to differ in their nasofacial and nasomental angles. The mean values derived from this sample could be utilized for comparison, diagnosis, and treatment planning in orthodontics, dentistry, and plastic surgery. There is an inverse relationship between the two angles. The greater the Nasomental angle, the smaller the Nasofacial angle.

International Journal of Applied Dental SciencesVol. 10(3)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relation between nasofacial angle and nasomental angle: A study based on profilometric analysis — Faisal Arshad, Shwetha GS, et al. · International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS