The Association Between Asymmetrical Hallux Valgus and Lumbar Spine Deformities: An Analysis from the Large General Population Cohort

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Bunion Introduction/Purpose: Various factors contribute to hallux valgus (HV), including footwear, genetics, gender, anatomical factors, and joint laxity. Theoretically, these factors should affect both sides equally, yet overwhelmingly, bilateral cases are more common. Although rare, there are instances of unilateral cases or cases with significant asymmetry between the left and right sides. However, there is a lack of systematic investigation into the background of such cases. Methods: Data from the fifth survey of the Osteoarthritis/Osteoporosis Against Disability (ROAD) study, a nationwide prospective study in Japan, were analyzed. HV severity was categorized into 4 grades based on the radiographic HV angle, and asymmetric HV was defined as having at least one HV on either side with a difference of two or more severity grades between the left and right. Controls were matched from both the normal group (without HV on both sides) and the symmetric group (HV on at least one side with a difference of one or less severity grades). Univariate analysis assessed lumbar conditions, and multinomial logistic regression analysis explored the association between lumbar spine disorders and asymmetric HV. Results: Among 1,231 participants, 27 (2.2%) had asymmetric HV. The asymmetrical group showed a significantly higher prevalence of L5 spondylolisthesis and scoliosis (asymmetrical vs symmetrical vs normal: [L5 spondylolisthesis] 15% vs 5% vs 1%, p = 0.0178; [scoliosis] 42% vs 20% vs 14%, p = 0.0095). The results of the multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds ratios for asymmetry, with normal as the reference, were 3.59 (95% CI: 1.11-11.58) in the presence of scoliosis and 6.98 (95% CI: 0.67-72.60) in the presence of L5 spondylolisthesis. Conclusion: Unilateral HV has been reported as a complication following spinal surgery. This study establishes a link between lumbar spine scoliosis and unilateral HV. It suggests the involvement of factors such as impairment of the hallux abductor muscle's innervating nerves or left-right load imbalance in the development of unilateral HV deformities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424s00522
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Association Between Asymmetrical Hallux Valgus and Lumbar Spine Deformities: An Analysis from the Large General Population Cohort

Takumi Matsumoto, Ryutaro Takeda, Sakae Tanaka
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

The Association Between Asymmetrical Hallux Valgus and Lumbar Spine Deformities: An Analysis from the Large General Population Cohort

Takumi Matsumoto, Ryutaro Takeda, Sakae Tanaka
article en

Abstract

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Bunion Introduction/Purpose: Various factors contribute to hallux valgus (HV), including footwear, genetics, gender, anatomical factors, and joint laxity. Theoretically, these factors should affect both sides equally, yet overwhelmingly, bilateral cases are more common. Although rare, there are instances of unilateral cases or cases with significant asymmetry between the left and right sides. However, there is a lack of systematic investigation into the background of such cases. Methods: Data from the fifth survey of the Osteoarthritis/Osteoporosis Against Disability (ROAD) study, a nationwide prospective study in Japan, were analyzed. HV severity was categorized into 4 grades based on the radiographic HV angle, and asymmetric HV was defined as having at least one HV on either side with a difference of two or more severity grades between the left and right. Controls were matched from both the normal group (without HV on both sides) and the symmetric group (HV on at least one side with a difference of one or less severity grades). Univariate analysis assessed lumbar conditions, and multinomial logistic regression analysis explored the association between lumbar spine disorders and asymmetric HV. Results: Among 1,231 participants, 27 (2.2%) had asymmetric HV. The asymmetrical group showed a significantly higher prevalence of L5 spondylolisthesis and scoliosis (asymmetrical vs symmetrical vs normal: [L5 spondylolisthesis] 15% vs 5% vs 1%, p = 0.0178; [scoliosis] 42% vs 20% vs 14%, p = 0.0095). The results of the multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds ratios for asymmetry, with normal as the reference, were 3.59 (95% CI: 1.11-11.58) in the presence of scoliosis and 6.98 (95% CI: 0.67-72.60) in the presence of L5 spondylolisthesis. Conclusion: Unilateral HV has been reported as a complication following spinal surgery. This study establishes a link between lumbar spine scoliosis and unilateral HV. It suggests the involvement of factors such as impairment of the hallux abductor muscle's innervating nerves or left-right load imbalance in the development of unilateral HV deformities.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 9(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.