The MIEM guidelines: Minimum information for reporting of environmental metabarcoding data

Environmental DNA (eDNA) and RNA (eRNA) metabarcoding has become a popular tool for assessing biodiversity from environmental samples, but inconsistent documentation of methods, data and metadata makes results difficult to reproduce and synthesise. A working group of scientists have collaborated to produce a set of minimum reporting guidelines for the constituent steps of metabarcoding workflows, from the physical layout of laboratories through to data archiving. We emphasise how reporting the suite of data and metadata should adhere to findable, accessible, interoperable and reproducible (FAIR) data standards, thereby providing context for evaluating and understanding study results. An overview of the documentation considerations for each workflow step is presented and then summarised in a checklist that can accompany a published study or report. Ensuring workflows are transparent and documented is critical to reproducible research and should allow for more efficient uptake of metabarcoding data into management decision-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.8.128689
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The MIEM guidelines: Minimum information for reporting of environmental metabarcoding data

Michelle J. Jungbluth, Rachel J. Brown, Rachel T. Noble, Zachary Gold et al.
17 citations
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
7.80
article

The MIEM guidelines: Minimum information for reporting of environmental metabarcoding data

Michelle J. Jungbluth, Rachel J. Brown, Rachel T. Noble, Zachary Gold, Aaron P. Maloy, Sean P. Jungbluth, Joshua A. Steele, Joseph M. Craine, Susanna Theroux, Adam J. Sepulveda, Margaret E. Hunter, Mark D. Johnson, Christopher M. Merkes, Cathryn L. Abbott, Miwa Takahashi, Jacoby Baker, Yer Lor, Nastassia Patin, Devin N. Jones, Stephen F. Spear, Katy E. Klymus, Alison Watts
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) and RNA (eRNA) metabarcoding has become a popular tool for assessing biodiversity from environmental samples, but inconsistent documentation of methods, data and metadata makes results difficult to reproduce and synthesise. A working group of scientists have collaborated to produce a set of minimum reporting guidelines for the constituent steps of metabarcoding workflows, from the physical layout of laboratories through to data archiving. We emphasise how reporting the suite of data and metadata should adhere to findable, accessible, interoperable and reproducible (FAIR) data standards, thereby providing context for evaluating and understanding study results. An overview of the documentation considerations for each workflow step is presented and then summarised in a checklist that can accompany a published study or report. Ensuring workflows are transparent and documented is critical to reproducible research and should allow for more efficient uptake of metabarcoding data into management decision-making.

Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsVol. 8
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
7.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.