The Mystery of Meary’s: 3D Analysis of First Ray Plantarflexion Deformity in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: The typical cavovarus deformity seen in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth involves plantarflexion of the first ray. Surgical correction often includes a dorsiflexion osteotomy at the first metatarsal base or medial cuneiform. The exact apex of the deformity has never been proven, although it is presumed to be within the medial cuneiform. The aim of this study was to utilize weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) to localize and quantify the plantarflexion deformity in CMT patients. Methods: WBCTs of 16 CMT patients with lateral Meary’s angle >20 degrees were compared to controls utilizing semi-automated analysis software (Disior Bonelogic). Due to the complex deformity seen in CMT patients, a local coordinate system based on the first metatarsal was used. The tarsometatarsal angle was subdivided into components (cuneiform-cuneiform joint normal, tarsometatarsal joint and metatarsal-metatarsal joint normal) and compared between CMT and controls (Figure 1A). CMT patient’s first, second and third rays were also compared. Means were compared with a 2-sample t test (p <.05). Results: CMT patients had significantly more plantarflexion of the first ray than controls (8.8 versus 16.4 degrees respectively (p < 0.001)) (Figure 1B). The largest difference of was found at the cuneiform-cuneiform joint normal with 20.6 degrees of plantarflexion in CMT patients versus 14.8 degrees in controls (p <.0001). There was also approximately 2 degrees of plantar flexion at the TMT joint (p <.001) but no difference at the metatarsal-metatarsal joint normal angle. When comparing the flexion of the first ray versus the second, as well as the second versus the third rays, there were significant differences in the tarsometatarsal, cuneiform-cuneiform joint and metatarsal-metatarsal joint angles. Conclusion: Plantarflexion deformity in CMT patients is primarily an osseous deformity at the level of the medial cuneiform with a lesser contribution from the tarsometatarsal joint. This finding has implications for CMT surgery regarding location of a dorsiflexion osteotomy at the apex of deformity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424s00544
Primary Topic
Hereditary Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mystery of Meary’s: 3D Analysis of First Ray Plantarflexion Deformity in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Max P. Michalski, Christian Blough, Jae Hwang Song, Glenn B. Pfeffer
1 links
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Hereditary Neurological Disorders
article

The Mystery of Meary’s: 3D Analysis of First Ray Plantarflexion Deformity in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Max P. Michalski, Christian Blough, Jae Hwang Song, Glenn B. Pfeffer
article en

Abstract

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: The typical cavovarus deformity seen in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth involves plantarflexion of the first ray. Surgical correction often includes a dorsiflexion osteotomy at the first metatarsal base or medial cuneiform. The exact apex of the deformity has never been proven, although it is presumed to be within the medial cuneiform. The aim of this study was to utilize weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) to localize and quantify the plantarflexion deformity in CMT patients. Methods: WBCTs of 16 CMT patients with lateral Meary’s angle >20 degrees were compared to controls utilizing semi-automated analysis software (Disior Bonelogic). Due to the complex deformity seen in CMT patients, a local coordinate system based on the first metatarsal was used. The tarsometatarsal angle was subdivided into components (cuneiform-cuneiform joint normal, tarsometatarsal joint and metatarsal-metatarsal joint normal) and compared between CMT and controls (Figure 1A). CMT patient’s first, second and third rays were also compared. Means were compared with a 2-sample t test (p <.05). Results: CMT patients had significantly more plantarflexion of the first ray than controls (8.8 versus 16.4 degrees respectively (p < 0.001)) (Figure 1B). The largest difference of was found at the cuneiform-cuneiform joint normal with 20.6 degrees of plantarflexion in CMT patients versus 14.8 degrees in controls (p <.0001). There was also approximately 2 degrees of plantar flexion at the TMT joint (p <.001) but no difference at the metatarsal-metatarsal joint normal angle. When comparing the flexion of the first ray versus the second, as well as the second versus the third rays, there were significant differences in the tarsometatarsal, cuneiform-cuneiform joint and metatarsal-metatarsal joint angles. Conclusion: Plantarflexion deformity in CMT patients is primarily an osseous deformity at the level of the medial cuneiform with a lesser contribution from the tarsometatarsal joint. This finding has implications for CMT surgery regarding location of a dorsiflexion osteotomy at the apex of deformity.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 9(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Hereditary Neurological Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.