Domestic Politics in the European Union’s Emissions Trading System: Evidence from Free Allowance Allocation

How do leaders determine to whom to target the benefits of new environmental policies? When the European Union first rolled out its Emissions Trading System in 2005, a cap-and-trade system that is the world’s largest carbon market regulating 40% of EU emissions, national governments commanded significant leeway in determining the distribution of pollution permits to emitters. The allocation of “free allowances” represented a choice to distribute a sizable economic asset, along with the ability to pollute for free under the new system. This paper describes the provision of free allowances over time and examines whether leaders provided greater free allowances to emitting installations located in politically consequential places. I find that, in the United Kingdom, installations located in more marginal electoral constituencies received more free allowances on average than installations located in less marginal districts. While consistent with theoretical expectations, the effect is not statistically significant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000113
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domestic Politics in the European Union’s Emissions Trading System: Evidence from Free Allowance Allocation

Justin Melnick
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Domestic Politics in the European Union’s Emissions Trading System: Evidence from Free Allowance Allocation

Justin Melnick
article en

Abstract

How do leaders determine to whom to target the benefits of new environmental policies? When the European Union first rolled out its Emissions Trading System in 2005, a cap-and-trade system that is the world’s largest carbon market regulating 40% of EU emissions, national governments commanded significant leeway in determining the distribution of pollution permits to emitters. The allocation of “free allowances” represented a choice to distribute a sizable economic asset, along with the ability to pollute for free under the new system. This paper describes the provision of free allowances over time and examines whether leaders provided greater free allowances to emitting installations located in politically consequential places. I find that, in the United Kingdom, installations located in more marginal electoral constituencies received more free allowances on average than installations located in less marginal districts. While consistent with theoretical expectations, the effect is not statistically significant.

Journal of Political Institutions and Political EconomyVol. 5(4)
New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Domestic Politics in the European Union’s Emissions Trading System: Evidence from Free Allowance Allocation — Justin Melnick · Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS