ToAnalyzeBladderCatheterizationProceduralSkillsAcquisitionAmongStudentsByUsingPeyton’s4StepApproachVersusConventionalMethodOfTeaching

Background: Conventional method of teaching(CMT) fail to assure competency in bladder catheterization (BC) in the Indian Medical Graduate (IMG).Introduction of structured training like Peyton's 4 steps (DDCP) could offer a solution.Objectives: To compare efficiency of Demonstration, Deconstruction, and Comprehension and Execution (DDCP) method of training in a skill lab against Conventional Method of Teaching (CMT)-based learning in training final MBBS students in the psychomotor skill to safely perform Bladder Catheterization.Materials and Methods: It was a randomized comparative study in which final MBBS students fulfilling selection criteria were randomly allocated into two comparable groups.One group underwent skill lab training using DDCP method while the other group underwent training using a CMT by the same instructor.All participants underwent assessment of skill in BC by skill lab OSCE evaluation, by assessors blinded to the participant's method of training.Data were recorded and analyzed using standard statistical software.Trial evaluation from the trial groups was obtained using Survey Monkey tool.Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the ability of DDCP group or CMT group to safely perform BC though a higher level of confidence was expressed with their training by DDCP group. Conclusion:Structured training assures competence.Video-assisted training produces comparable results though DDCP method is preferred by students.A combination of the techniques may facilitate optimal training.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i4s.5563
Primary Topic
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ToAnalyzeBladderCatheterizationProceduralSkillsAcquisitionAmongStudentsByUsingPeyton’s4StepApproachVersusConventionalMethodOfTeaching

Dr.Shaikh AaliahNaaz
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
article

ToAnalyzeBladderCatheterizationProceduralSkillsAcquisitionAmongStudentsByUsingPeyton’s4StepApproachVersusConventionalMethodOfTeaching

Dr.Shaikh AaliahNaaz
article en

Abstract

Background: Conventional method of teaching(CMT) fail to assure competency in bladder catheterization (BC) in the Indian Medical Graduate (IMG).Introduction of structured training like Peyton's 4 steps (DDCP) could offer a solution.Objectives: To compare efficiency of Demonstration, Deconstruction, and Comprehension and Execution (DDCP) method of training in a skill lab against Conventional Method of Teaching (CMT)-based learning in training final MBBS students in the psychomotor skill to safely perform Bladder Catheterization.Materials and Methods: It was a randomized comparative study in which final MBBS students fulfilling selection criteria were randomly allocated into two comparable groups.One group underwent skill lab training using DDCP method while the other group underwent training using a CMT by the same instructor.All participants underwent assessment of skill in BC by skill lab OSCE evaluation, by assessors blinded to the participant's method of training.Data were recorded and analyzed using standard statistical software.Trial evaluation from the trial groups was obtained using Survey Monkey tool.Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the ability of DDCP group or CMT group to safely perform BC though a higher level of confidence was expressed with their training by DDCP group. Conclusion:Structured training assures competence.Video-assisted training produces comparable results though DDCP method is preferred by students.A combination of the techniques may facilitate optimal training.

African Journal of Biomedical Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.