Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages

The article compares machine learning tools using the example of several popular programming languages. Existing tools in the following programming languages were tested and compared with each other: Python, Java, R, Julia, C#. For the needs of article, algorithms were created in each studied language, operating on the same test set and using algorithms from the same group. The collected results included the program's running time, number of lines of code and accuracy of trained model. Based on the obtained data, conclusions were drawn that interpreted language libraries in terms of creating machine learning solutions are more effective than compiled language libraries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.6589
Primary Topic
Computational Physics and Python Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages

Jakub Smółka, Tomasz Wiejak
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Computational Physics and Python Applications
article

Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages

Jakub Smółka, Tomasz Wiejak
article en

Abstract

The article compares machine learning tools using the example of several popular programming languages. Existing tools in the following programming languages were tested and compared with each other: Python, Java, R, Julia, C#. For the needs of article, algorithms were created in each studied language, operating on the same test set and using algorithms from the same group. The collected results included the program's running time, number of lines of code and accuracy of trained model. Based on the obtained data, conclusions were drawn that interpreted language libraries in terms of creating machine learning solutions are more effective than compiled language libraries.

Journal of Computer Sciences InstituteVol. 33
Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Computational Physics and Python Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.