Performance comparison of the Java and Kotlin programming languages based on an auto-scroller mobile game

The article contains a performance comparison of two mobile applications, developed in the Java and Kotlin programming languages respectively. The applications took the form of an auto-scroller game and shared their graphics assets. The aim of the work was to confirm or reject the hypothesis: Java is slightly more efficient than Kotlin in the presented context. The subject of comparison was the consumption of CPU, RAM and the device’s battery resources. The mentioned metrics were obtained using the Android Profiler tool. The study was conducted using two mobile devices. The results confirm the research hypothesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.6314
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mobile and Web Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance comparison of the Java and Kotlin programming languages based on an auto-scroller mobile game

Małgorzata Plechawska–Wójcik, Piotr Gajek
1 citations
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Mobile and Web Applications
0.78
article

Performance comparison of the Java and Kotlin programming languages based on an auto-scroller mobile game

Małgorzata Plechawska–Wójcik, Piotr Gajek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article contains a performance comparison of two mobile applications, developed in the Java and Kotlin programming languages respectively. The applications took the form of an auto-scroller game and shared their graphics assets. The aim of the work was to confirm or reject the hypothesis: Java is slightly more efficient than Kotlin in the presented context. The subject of comparison was the consumption of CPU, RAM and the device’s battery resources. The mentioned metrics were obtained using the Android Profiler tool. The study was conducted using two mobile devices. The results confirm the research hypothesis.

Journal of Computer Sciences InstituteVol. 33
Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Mobile and Web Applications
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.