Understanding Alignment in the Execution of Extractable Screening Studies Between Laboratories: Results of the ELSIE Lab Practices Sub-Team Industry Surveys

Substances that can be extracted (<i>extractables</i>) from the components of a medical device or a pharmaceutical product's manufacturing, packaging, and/or delivery system(s) are characterized as part of an extractable screening study to ensure the safety of the associated therapy. While the requirements of such studies have been established on a strategic level, the tactical approaches for their execution are less controlled, and as such, have been established on a laboratory-by-laboratory basis. Based on anecdotal accounts, differences in these tactical variables have resulted in inconsistent data obtained between laboratories when all other factors are equal. To better understand this potential issue, the Lab Practices Working Group within the Extractable & Leachable Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) has conducted two surveys of the practices used by several pharmaceutical sponsors and contract research organizations for their execution of extractable screening studies. The results obtained from these surveys uncovered a lack of alignment in some experimental variables for the execution of these studies including selection and use of surrogate standard(s), establishment of system suitability, qualification of screening methods, and use of uncertainty factors. Accordingly, it was concluded that the potential exists for at least some differences in the data obtained from extractable screening studies between laboratories due to the inconsistencies in their execution uncovered in these surveys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012964
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Alignment in the Execution of Extractable Screening Studies Between Laboratories: Results of the ELSIE Lab Practices Sub-Team Industry Surveys

Steven A. Zdravkovic, Lee M. Nagao, Qiang Fu, Mary Kate Bielinski et al.
2 citations
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
0.65
article

Understanding Alignment in the Execution of Extractable Screening Studies Between Laboratories: Results of the ELSIE Lab Practices Sub-Team Industry Surveys

Steven A. Zdravkovic, Lee M. Nagao, Qiang Fu, Mary Kate Bielinski, Aaron Flick, Bhargava Jana, Elizabeth Looney, Samuel Kikandi, Tim Verdonck
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Substances that can be extracted (<i>extractables</i>) from the components of a medical device or a pharmaceutical product's manufacturing, packaging, and/or delivery system(s) are characterized as part of an extractable screening study to ensure the safety of the associated therapy. While the requirements of such studies have been established on a strategic level, the tactical approaches for their execution are less controlled, and as such, have been established on a laboratory-by-laboratory basis. Based on anecdotal accounts, differences in these tactical variables have resulted in inconsistent data obtained between laboratories when all other factors are equal. To better understand this potential issue, the Lab Practices Working Group within the Extractable & Leachable Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) has conducted two surveys of the practices used by several pharmaceutical sponsors and contract research organizations for their execution of extractable screening studies. The results obtained from these surveys uncovered a lack of alignment in some experimental variables for the execution of these studies including selection and use of surrogate standard(s), establishment of system suitability, qualification of screening methods, and use of uncertainty factors. Accordingly, it was concluded that the potential exists for at least some differences in the data obtained from extractable screening studies between laboratories due to the inconsistencies in their execution uncovered in these surveys.

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and TechnologyVol. 79(1)
Regent University (US), Pfizer (United States) (US), Baxter (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.