Four-Route Lexical Access Model in Learners’ English-Chinese Translation

This study delves into the intricate relationship between semantic meaning and word access in translation, employing four semantic meanings as a research framework within linguistic contrast. Drawing on the theoretical foundations of bilingual language processing, the research seeks to illuminate the cognitive processes involved in lexical retrieval and semantic coherence maintenance during translation tasks. Extending existing literature, which underscores the significance of semantic ambiguity and contextual cues in translation, this study explores how translators navigate semantic uncertainties. Preliminary findings reveal a prevalent tendency among students to employ a direct translation approach, characterized by fixed word meaning conversions and limited contextual comprehension prior to translation. Additionally, the study identifies four distinct pathways for accessing lexical concepts during translation: (1) involves activation of lemmas and concepts, leading to accurate translation outcomes, while (2) illustrate asymmetric lexical access, resulting in translation discrepancies. (3) Highlights difficulties in locating corresponding access concepts, hindering translation efforts, and (4) emphasizes the selection of seemingly similar but conceptually disparate Chinese lexical items directly from English access concepts, leading to mismatches. These findings underscore the importance of a nuanced understanding of bilingual lexical concepts to effectively navigate translation challenges. Keywords: lexical meaning, word access in translation, English-Chinese translation, word processing, semantics

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CURRENT TRENDS IN TRANSLATION TEACHING AND LEARNING E
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51287/cttl20245
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Four-Route Lexical Access Model in Learners’ English-Chinese Translation

C.-Y. Edwin Tsai
CURRENT TRENDS IN TRANSLATION TEACHING AND LEARNING E
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Four-Route Lexical Access Model in Learners’ English-Chinese Translation

C.-Y. Edwin Tsai
article en

Abstract

This study delves into the intricate relationship between semantic meaning and word access in translation, employing four semantic meanings as a research framework within linguistic contrast. Drawing on the theoretical foundations of bilingual language processing, the research seeks to illuminate the cognitive processes involved in lexical retrieval and semantic coherence maintenance during translation tasks. Extending existing literature, which underscores the significance of semantic ambiguity and contextual cues in translation, this study explores how translators navigate semantic uncertainties. Preliminary findings reveal a prevalent tendency among students to employ a direct translation approach, characterized by fixed word meaning conversions and limited contextual comprehension prior to translation. Additionally, the study identifies four distinct pathways for accessing lexical concepts during translation: (1) involves activation of lemmas and concepts, leading to accurate translation outcomes, while (2) illustrate asymmetric lexical access, resulting in translation discrepancies. (3) Highlights difficulties in locating corresponding access concepts, hindering translation efforts, and (4) emphasizes the selection of seemingly similar but conceptually disparate Chinese lexical items directly from English access concepts, leading to mismatches. These findings underscore the importance of a nuanced understanding of bilingual lexical concepts to effectively navigate translation challenges. Keywords: lexical meaning, word access in translation, English-Chinese translation, word processing, semantics

CURRENT TRENDS IN TRANSLATION TEACHING AND LEARNING EVol. 11
University of Taipei (TW)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.