The Responsibility to Protect the Civilians of Gaza: Building on International Perceptions

This paper examines the relevance of applying the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) to the ‘atrocity crimes’ being committed in the Gaza Strip, in light of Israel's 2023 military operation, the October 7th attacks by Hamas and the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Drawing on 40 recent original expert interviews representing perspectives from both Western and BRICS countries, the research reveals a widespread demand to see the R2P applied to the civilians of Gaza and anger at the paralysis of decision-making at the UN Security Council. The double standards in the application of the R2P are found to further exacerbate global tensions. Wider consequences of the Palestinian plight are investigated, including the new menaces to the freedom of speech, the internal fracture in the West between populations and policy-makers, the reticence of the Arab world to support the Palestinians and the substantial threat to the perennity of the R2P.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Peacekeeping
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2024.2427208
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Responsibility to Protect the Civilians of Gaza: Building on International Perceptions

Andrey A. Baykov, Anne Crowley‐Vigneau, Teng Zhang, В.А. Морозов
3 citations
International Peacekeeping
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
6.69
article

The Responsibility to Protect the Civilians of Gaza: Building on International Perceptions

Andrey A. Baykov, Anne Crowley‐Vigneau, Teng Zhang, В.А. Морозов
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the relevance of applying the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) to the ‘atrocity crimes’ being committed in the Gaza Strip, in light of Israel's 2023 military operation, the October 7th attacks by Hamas and the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Drawing on 40 recent original expert interviews representing perspectives from both Western and BRICS countries, the research reveals a widespread demand to see the R2P applied to the civilians of Gaza and anger at the paralysis of decision-making at the UN Security Council. The double standards in the application of the R2P are found to further exacerbate global tensions. Wider consequences of the Palestinian plight are investigated, including the new menaces to the freedom of speech, the internal fracture in the West between populations and policy-makers, the reticence of the Arab world to support the Palestinians and the substantial threat to the perennity of the R2P.

International PeacekeepingVol. 32(1)
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU), Peking University (CN), University of Reading (GB), Beijing International Studies University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
6.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.