A multi-attribute group decision-making method for optimal selection of digital voting tools to ameliorate public participation in urban transport

In urban transport decision-making, enhancing public participation is crucial for creating more inclusive and effective policies. The selection of digital voting tools is vital in facilitating this participation. This study aims to develop a decision-making model for evaluating and selecting digital voting tools based on uncertain factors. A multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) approach is introduced for the evaluation and assessment of various digital voting tools, considering multiple aspects according to the needs of the policies and the stakeholders. A well-known framework called picture fuzzy rough est (PFRS) models the expert's opinion concerning the tools considered. This study proposes the MAGDM model integrating the Schweizer-Sklar t-norm (SSTNrM) and the Schweizer-Sklar t-conorm (SSTCNrM), i.e., picture fuzzy rough weighted averaging (PFRSSWA) and picture fuzzy rough weighted geometric (PFRSSWG), are introduced to aggregate the data in the form of the picture fuzzy rough values (PFRVs). The created AOs select the most appropriate digital voting tool based on the characteristics provided in a given list. The ranking of the tools is observed by altering the values of the involved parameters in SSTNrM and SSTCNrM. The findings obtained also contrast with those of other known AOs. Additionally, a graphic representation of each observation and result is provided.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103867
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-attribute group decision-making method for optimal selection of digital voting tools to ameliorate public participation in urban transport

Domokos Esztergár‐Kiss, Sarbast Moslem, Amir Hussain, Tapan Senapati et al.
3 citations
Results in Engineering
Transportation Planning and Optimization
2.05
article

A multi-attribute group decision-making method for optimal selection of digital voting tools to ameliorate public participation in urban transport

Domokos Esztergár‐Kiss, Sarbast Moslem, Amir Hussain, Tapan Senapati, Kifayat Ullah
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In urban transport decision-making, enhancing public participation is crucial for creating more inclusive and effective policies. The selection of digital voting tools is vital in facilitating this participation. This study aims to develop a decision-making model for evaluating and selecting digital voting tools based on uncertain factors. A multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) approach is introduced for the evaluation and assessment of various digital voting tools, considering multiple aspects according to the needs of the policies and the stakeholders. A well-known framework called picture fuzzy rough est (PFRS) models the expert's opinion concerning the tools considered. This study proposes the MAGDM model integrating the Schweizer-Sklar t-norm (SSTNrM) and the Schweizer-Sklar t-conorm (SSTCNrM), i.e., picture fuzzy rough weighted averaging (PFRSSWA) and picture fuzzy rough weighted geometric (PFRSSWG), are introduced to aggregate the data in the form of the picture fuzzy rough values (PFRVs). The created AOs select the most appropriate digital voting tool based on the characteristics provided in a given list. The ranking of the tools is observed by altering the values of the involved parameters in SSTNrM and SSTCNrM. The findings obtained also contrast with those of other known AOs. Additionally, a graphic representation of each observation and result is provided.

Results in EngineeringVol. 25
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.