Equivalent contact temperature (ECT) for personal comfort assessment – definition of comfort limits for winter conditions

This article revisits the Equivalent Contact Temperature (ECT) model by incorporating winter scenarios with seat heating, which were unaddressed in previous studies. The research focuses on enhancing the model's accuracy in evaluating thermal comfort for seated individuals under non-uniform conditions, particularly for the buttocks and back. These contact areas are crucial for both local and overall comfort, especially with Personalised Environmental Control Systems (PECS), like seat heating and ventilation, which operate close to the body. PECS are more energy efficient than traditional HVAC systems, offering customisation to individual comfort preferences while enhancing individual thermal comfort and energy efficiency in buildings and vehicles. A participant study at air temperatures of 17 °C and 18 °C validated the ECT approach, confirming the effectiveness of seat heating and revealing key correlations between ECT values and thermal comfort ratings. Additionally, an equivalent skin temperature and a comfort evaluation scheme for winter conditions were introduced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ergonomics
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2445315
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equivalent contact temperature (ECT) for personal comfort assessment – definition of comfort limits for winter conditions

Alexander Warthmann, Christoph van Treeck, Marc Syndicus
Ergonomics
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Equivalent contact temperature (ECT) for personal comfort assessment – definition of comfort limits for winter conditions

Alexander Warthmann, Christoph van Treeck, Marc Syndicus
article en

Abstract

This article revisits the Equivalent Contact Temperature (ECT) model by incorporating winter scenarios with seat heating, which were unaddressed in previous studies. The research focuses on enhancing the model's accuracy in evaluating thermal comfort for seated individuals under non-uniform conditions, particularly for the buttocks and back. These contact areas are crucial for both local and overall comfort, especially with Personalised Environmental Control Systems (PECS), like seat heating and ventilation, which operate close to the body. PECS are more energy efficient than traditional HVAC systems, offering customisation to individual comfort preferences while enhancing individual thermal comfort and energy efficiency in buildings and vehicles. A participant study at air temperatures of 17 °C and 18 °C validated the ECT approach, confirming the effectiveness of seat heating and revealing key correlations between ECT values and thermal comfort ratings. Additionally, an equivalent skin temperature and a comfort evaluation scheme for winter conditions were introduced.

ErgonomicsVol. 68(11)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.