Ascertaining provider-level implicit bias in electronic health records with rules-based natural language processing: A pilot study in the case of prostate cancer

In this pilot study, providers' practice patterns were associated with both patient race and implicit racial preferences in prostate cancer. Alerting providers of existing implicit bias may restore parity, however future assessments are needed to validate this concept.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314989
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ascertaining provider-level implicit bias in electronic health records with rules-based natural language processing: A pilot study in the case of prostate cancer

Charlotta Lindvall, Christopher E. Barbieri, Joe Pelt, Douglas S. Scherr et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Migration, Health and Trauma
0.64
article

Ascertaining provider-level implicit bias in electronic health records with rules-based natural language processing: A pilot study in the case of prostate cancer

Charlotta Lindvall, Christopher E. Barbieri, Joe Pelt, Douglas S. Scherr, Neal Patel, Lina Posada Calderon, Ashwin Ramaswamy, I Scherr, Gerald Wang, Parsa Iranmahboub, Jim C. Hu, Michael Hung, David Green, Timothy McClure
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this pilot study, providers' practice patterns were associated with both patient race and implicit racial preferences in prostate cancer. Alerting providers of existing implicit bias may restore parity, however future assessments are needed to validate this concept.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(12)
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Cornell University (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Migration, Health and Trauma
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.