Locally Constrained Guessing Codeword Decoding of Short Block Codes

This paper is concerned with a universal guessing codeword decoding (GCD) of linear block codes, referred to as locally constrained GCD (LC-GCD), which does not require the online Gaussian elimination (GE). Distinguished from the GCD algorithm, the proposed LC-GCD queries the partial error patterns using the serial list Viterbi algorithm (SLVA) over a trellis specified by a local parity-check matrix, typically reducing the number of queries. Moreover, we introduce a parallel implementation of the LC-GCD algorithm to reduce decoding latency without compromising performance. Numerical results show that the LC-GCD requires a fewer number of queries than the GCD without performance loss, indicating a lower complexity in general. The comparisons with other decoding algorithms are also provided to demonstrate the potential advantage in complexity of the LC-GCD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/itw61385.2024.10806923
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Error Correcting Code Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locally Constrained Guessing Codeword Decoding of Short Block Codes

Xiao Ma, Xiangping Zheng
7 citations
Error Correcting Code Techniques
2.44
article

Locally Constrained Guessing Codeword Decoding of Short Block Codes

Xiao Ma, Xiangping Zheng
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This paper is concerned with a universal guessing codeword decoding (GCD) of linear block codes, referred to as locally constrained GCD (LC-GCD), which does not require the online Gaussian elimination (GE). Distinguished from the GCD algorithm, the proposed LC-GCD queries the partial error patterns using the serial list Viterbi algorithm (SLVA) over a trellis specified by a local parity-check matrix, typically reducing the number of queries. Moreover, we introduce a parallel implementation of the LC-GCD algorithm to reduce decoding latency without compromising performance. Numerical results show that the LC-GCD requires a fewer number of queries than the GCD without performance loss, indicating a lower complexity in general. The comparisons with other decoding algorithms are also provided to demonstrate the potential advantage in complexity of the LC-GCD.

Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Error Correcting Code Techniques
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.