Optimal AI Models for Process Data Analysis in Industry 4.0 Regarding Digital Twin Implementation

This study compares YOLOv8 and Mask R-CNN object detection algorithms for defect detection in digital twin applications for smart manufacturing. With the ongoing transformation of manufacturing processes in Industry 4.0 and 5.0, integrating digital twin technology and advanced visual inspection techniques has become crucial for improving quality control and process optimization. Using the expanded MVTec Metal Nut Dataset, we evaluated performance based on mean average precision (mAP), precision, recall, F1-score, and inference time. Results show YOLOv8 consistently outperformed Mask R-CNN in accuracy and computational efficiency, achieving higher scores across all metrics and quicker inference times. This suggests YOLOv8 is more suitable for real-time industrial applications, particularly in digital twin implementations. However, the study emphasizes the importance of considering specific manufacturing contexts when selecting an object detection model. The integration of AI-powered visual inspection with digital twin technology has significant potential to enhance product quality, reduce downtime, and optimize production processes, contributing valuable empirical evidence to guide the implementation of advanced defect detection systems in industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/incit63192.2024.10810585
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal AI Models for Process Data Analysis in Industry 4.0 Regarding Digital Twin Implementation

Chalermpan Fongsamut, Prajaks Jitngernmadan, Tanat Kanangnanon
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Optimal AI Models for Process Data Analysis in Industry 4.0 Regarding Digital Twin Implementation

Chalermpan Fongsamut, Prajaks Jitngernmadan, Tanat Kanangnanon
article en

Abstract

This study compares YOLOv8 and Mask R-CNN object detection algorithms for defect detection in digital twin applications for smart manufacturing. With the ongoing transformation of manufacturing processes in Industry 4.0 and 5.0, integrating digital twin technology and advanced visual inspection techniques has become crucial for improving quality control and process optimization. Using the expanded MVTec Metal Nut Dataset, we evaluated performance based on mean average precision (mAP), precision, recall, F1-score, and inference time. Results show YOLOv8 consistently outperformed Mask R-CNN in accuracy and computational efficiency, achieving higher scores across all metrics and quicker inference times. This suggests YOLOv8 is more suitable for real-time industrial applications, particularly in digital twin implementations. However, the study emphasizes the importance of considering specific manufacturing contexts when selecting an object detection model. The integration of AI-powered visual inspection with digital twin technology has significant potential to enhance product quality, reduce downtime, and optimize production processes, contributing valuable empirical evidence to guide the implementation of advanced defect detection systems in industry.

Burapha University (TH)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimal AI Models for Process Data Analysis in Industry 4.0 Regarding Digital Twin Implementation — Chalermpan Fongsamut, Prajaks Jitngernmadan, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS