Integrating Machine Learning and OBIA for Vegetation Classification in Archived Grayscale Aerial Imagery

This study explores the use of machine learning models to classify water, vegetation, and non-vegetation land cover types in archived grayscale aerial imagery. The input images are segmented using a superpixel algorithm, and the resulting segments are mapped to expert-provided reference data. The region-based and patch-based approaches are evaluated using artificial neural networks and convolutional neural networks, respectively. The region-based method achieves an average accuracy of 0.83, while the patch-based method reaches 0.79. Although the patch-based method shows slightly lower overall accuracy, it significantly improves recall rates, particularly for the water and non-vegetation classes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/incit63192.2024.10810561
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Machine Learning and OBIA for Vegetation Classification in Archived Grayscale Aerial Imagery

Wira Srimala, Chamnan Kumsap, Kumpee Teeravech, Warakorn Luangluewut et al.
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Integrating Machine Learning and OBIA for Vegetation Classification in Archived Grayscale Aerial Imagery

Wira Srimala, Chamnan Kumsap, Kumpee Teeravech, Warakorn Luangluewut, Taweesak Samma, Phummipat Ounban, Kraisri Sawangsri, Kittakorn Viriyasatr
article en

Abstract

This study explores the use of machine learning models to classify water, vegetation, and non-vegetation land cover types in archived grayscale aerial imagery. The input images are segmented using a superpixel algorithm, and the resulting segments are mapped to expert-provided reference data. The region-based and patch-based approaches are evaluated using artificial neural networks and convolutional neural networks, respectively. The region-based method achieves an average accuracy of 0.83, while the patch-based method reaches 0.79. Although the patch-based method shows slightly lower overall accuracy, it significantly improves recall rates, particularly for the water and non-vegetation classes.

Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University (TH)
Thailand Science Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.