Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Trash Classification on Embedded Devices

Trash classification represents a significant challenge in waste recycling industry, leading often to contamination due to manual misclassification of recyclable and non-recyclable items. This arises because human judgment relies on experience and knowledge rather than on objective criteria. To address this issue many scholars have proposed automated classification systems based on machine learning and deep learning (DL). All these works have not been tested on real time embedded systems. This paper proposes a comparison between several DL models to categorize waste into cardboard, plastic, glass, metal, paper, and general trash. Several DL architectures were retrained and implemented on a Raspberry Pi, i.e., MobileNet, ResNet, EfficientNet, and DenseNet models. The performance, i.e., classification accuracy, inference time and maximum number of frames per second (FPS) of these models were evaluated using the TrashNet dataset [4]. The obtained results demonstrate that EfficientNet B3 achieved the best performance based on compared parameters as well as a testing accuracy at about $86 \%$, while DenseNet achieved the lowest performance parameters with a low accuracy of $79 \%$. Additionally, the models were evaluated for their performance on embedded devices. According to the experiment conducted in this work, MobileNetV2 was the fastest at classification, while EfficientNet B7 was the slowest. Considering both accuracy and speed, EfficientNet B3 is the best model for real time applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icspis63676.2024.10812636
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Trash Classification on Embedded Devices

Firas G. Petros, Farid Flitti, Arman Ahmed, Yassine Benachour et al.
4 citations
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
1.40
article

Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Trash Classification on Embedded Devices

Firas G. Petros, Farid Flitti, Arman Ahmed, Yassine Benachour, Tomas Yemane
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Trash classification represents a significant challenge in waste recycling industry, leading often to contamination due to manual misclassification of recyclable and non-recyclable items. This arises because human judgment relies on experience and knowledge rather than on objective criteria. To address this issue many scholars have proposed automated classification systems based on machine learning and deep learning (DL). All these works have not been tested on real time embedded systems. This paper proposes a comparison between several DL models to categorize waste into cardboard, plastic, glass, metal, paper, and general trash. Several DL architectures were retrained and implemented on a Raspberry Pi, i.e., MobileNet, ResNet, EfficientNet, and DenseNet models. The performance, i.e., classification accuracy, inference time and maximum number of frames per second (FPS) of these models were evaluated using the TrashNet dataset [4]. The obtained results demonstrate that EfficientNet B3 achieved the best performance based on compared parameters as well as a testing accuracy at about $86 \%$, while DenseNet achieved the lowest performance parameters with a low accuracy of $79 \%$. Additionally, the models were evaluated for their performance on embedded devices. According to the experiment conducted in this work, MobileNetV2 was the fastest at classification, while EfficientNet B7 was the slowest. Considering both accuracy and speed, EfficientNet B3 is the best model for real time applications.

Higher Colleges of Technology (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.