Impact of Missing Data on Data Quality in Social Research

Missing data is a common issue in quantitative social research that negatively affects the data quality. This article explores the consequences of missing data, outlining the potential issues it may pose and emphasizing the importance of properly addressing the missingness. It outlines the patterns of missing data, with a focus on the need to distinguish data that's Missing at Random and data that's Missing Not at Random, explaining how these patterns may affect the choice of handling methods. The article illustrates various approaches to managing missing data through a combination of hypothetical scenarios and case studies from actual research in order to showcase the application and effectiveness of various methods. It showcases the traditional methods of handling missing data, such as complete case analysis and simple imputation methods, and their limitations. Emphasizing the importance of advanced statistical techniques, the article advocates for the use of multiple imputation as a main method of choice when dealing with missing data. By providing a methodological comparison and a strategic framework for social scientists facing missing data challenges, this work provides a strategy to be employed by social scientists when dealing with missing data in order to ensure the proper data quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological studios
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2024-02-31-31
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Missing Data on Data Quality in Social Research

Yaroslav Kostenko
1 citations
Sociological studios
Data Quality and Management
0.49
article

Impact of Missing Data on Data Quality in Social Research

Yaroslav Kostenko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Missing data is a common issue in quantitative social research that negatively affects the data quality. This article explores the consequences of missing data, outlining the potential issues it may pose and emphasizing the importance of properly addressing the missingness. It outlines the patterns of missing data, with a focus on the need to distinguish data that's Missing at Random and data that's Missing Not at Random, explaining how these patterns may affect the choice of handling methods. The article illustrates various approaches to managing missing data through a combination of hypothetical scenarios and case studies from actual research in order to showcase the application and effectiveness of various methods. It showcases the traditional methods of handling missing data, such as complete case analysis and simple imputation methods, and their limitations. Emphasizing the importance of advanced statistical techniques, the article advocates for the use of multiple imputation as a main method of choice when dealing with missing data. By providing a methodological comparison and a strategic framework for social scientists facing missing data challenges, this work provides a strategy to be employed by social scientists when dealing with missing data in order to ensure the proper data quality.

Sociological studios(2(25))
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (UA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Data Quality and Management
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.