Do daily motivational demands promote or inhibit one’s performance and well-being? The role of appraisals and empowering leadership.

Many of today’s jobs require employees to “set their own goals, decide how hard they work to achieve that goal, and decide when the task is complete” (i.e., motivational demands). However, when and how such motivational demands influence employee outcomes remains unclear. Building on transactional stress theory, we develop a dual-pathway model in which motivational demands link to employee outcomes (task performance, creativity, and exhaustion) through two independent mechanisms: (a) challenge and (b) hindrance appraisals, while controlling affective mediators (i.e., daily positive and negative affect). Further, we argue that as a job resource, empowering leadership will moderate the relationship between motivational demands and appraisals. We conducted a 10-day diary study in China to test our hypotheses (105 participants with 949 daily observations). Multilevel analysis revealed that daily motivational demands positively relate to creativity and task performance through challenge appraisal, whereas it is negatively linked to exhaustion through hindrance appraisal. In addition, we found that daily empowering leadership moderates the relationship between motivational demands and challenge appraisals. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Stress Management
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000342
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do daily motivational demands promote or inhibit one’s performance and well-being? The role of appraisals and empowering leadership.

Peikai Li, Maria C. W. Peeters, Toon W. Taris
2 citations
International Journal of Stress Management
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
0.64
article

Do daily motivational demands promote or inhibit one’s performance and well-being? The role of appraisals and empowering leadership.

Peikai Li, Maria C. W. Peeters, Toon W. Taris
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Many of today’s jobs require employees to “set their own goals, decide how hard they work to achieve that goal, and decide when the task is complete” (i.e., motivational demands). However, when and how such motivational demands influence employee outcomes remains unclear. Building on transactional stress theory, we develop a dual-pathway model in which motivational demands link to employee outcomes (task performance, creativity, and exhaustion) through two independent mechanisms: (a) challenge and (b) hindrance appraisals, while controlling affective mediators (i.e., daily positive and negative affect). Further, we argue that as a job resource, empowering leadership will moderate the relationship between motivational demands and appraisals. We conducted a 10-day diary study in China to test our hypotheses (105 participants with 949 daily observations). Multilevel analysis revealed that daily motivational demands positively relate to creativity and task performance through challenge appraisal, whereas it is negatively linked to exhaustion through hindrance appraisal. In addition, we found that daily empowering leadership moderates the relationship between motivational demands and challenge appraisals. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

International Journal of Stress ManagementVol. 32(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.