True or False? At Least 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements Have Been Detected by ICP-MS in COVID-19 “Vaccines”
Claims of “major flaws” in Diblasi et al. 2024, the article appearing in this journal immediately before this commentary, were published in The Defender after Mike Adams, in his own words, “leveled harsh criticism against Children’s Health Defense”. Those complaints were more directly against this journal and its editors because we reviewed and published that work. Adams said that some values reported were tinier than any detectable by the Agilent 7500cx instrument. From a typo, “µ” for “m” he inferred incompetence and fraudulent intent by the Diblasi team, and said the IJVTPR editors were “duped”. Consequently, we have re-examined the work from raw data to its individual tabled values, every one of them. That flagrant keystroke error was purged with others, but the conclusion stands: the COVID-19 injectables contain at least 55 undeclared chemical elements including so-called “rare earth” metals and 12 of the 15 lanthanides. The likelihood that such elements are not involved in self-assembling entities in the fluids and in the unnatural clots in many recipients is zero. Ongoing gain-of-function bioweapons research together with published agendas for population reduction and control suggest that military-grade nanotechnologies are at play in the world-wide COVID-19 experiment.
Authors
- Daniel Broudy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-6914)
- John W. Oller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7666-651X)
- Daniel Santiago (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-0592)
- Robert M. Davidson
- Shimon Yanowitz
Institutions
- University of New Mexico (US)
- American Pharmacists Association (US)
- Special Health Resources for Texas (US)
- Okinawa Christian University (JP)
- University of Haifa (IL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Vaccine Theory Practice and Research
- Published
- 2024-12-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.56098/98sw8e86
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Analytical chemistry methods development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.47