Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for olive oil with reduced pesticide use in the Euro-Mediterranean region: A reference-dependent contingent valuation approach

While discussions on plant protection product regulations continue within the EU, insights into consumer behaviour regarding the reduction of pesticide use in olive oil production remain limited. This study explores consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) a premium for conventional extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) with 40 % reduced pesticide use across five Mediterranean EU countries. Employing the contingent valuation method—a stated preference experimental approach—with 'payment cards' based on past purchase records, we surveyed 5091 olive oil consumers in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain using Qualtrics' consumer panels. To analyse the factors influencing both the decision to pay a premium and the premium amount, we applied the Heckman sample selection model, a statistical technique that addresses sample selection bias. The results reveal that 73 % of consumers are willing to pay a premium, with mean premiums ranging from 22 % in Italy to 26 % in France above the reference price for a 1-L bottle of conventional EVOO. Socio-demographic factors—such as age, income, education, and household size—shape the likelihood of paying a premium. Meanwhile, behavioural factors—including knowledge and perceptions of pesticide use—primarily determine the size of the premium. Consumers' age, household income, and previous purchase price also influence the premium amount, although the behavioural factors exert the strongest impact, notably in France, Greece, Portugal, and Spain. These findings offer actionable insights to support the sector's transition to sustainable pesticide use, aligning consumer preferences with the EU's Green Deal objective of halving pesticide use by 2030. • Reference-dependent contingent valuation enhances realism. • 73 % of consumers will pay more for olive oil with reduced pesticide use. • Premium for pesticide-reduced EVOO averages 22–26 % over standard prices. • Behavioural and demographic factors influence consumer WTP a premium. • Findings support EU Green Deal goal of reducing pesticide use by 50 % by 2030.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101629
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for olive oil with reduced pesticide use in the Euro-Mediterranean region: A reference-dependent contingent valuation approach

Zein Kallas, Yasmina Baba, Noah Larvoe, Felicidad De Herralde
4 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Economic and Environmental Valuation
4.52
article

Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for olive oil with reduced pesticide use in the Euro-Mediterranean region: A reference-dependent contingent valuation approach

Zein Kallas, Yasmina Baba, Noah Larvoe, Felicidad De Herralde
article en
4 citations

Abstract

While discussions on plant protection product regulations continue within the EU, insights into consumer behaviour regarding the reduction of pesticide use in olive oil production remain limited. This study explores consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) a premium for conventional extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) with 40 % reduced pesticide use across five Mediterranean EU countries. Employing the contingent valuation method—a stated preference experimental approach—with 'payment cards' based on past purchase records, we surveyed 5091 olive oil consumers in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain using Qualtrics' consumer panels. To analyse the factors influencing both the decision to pay a premium and the premium amount, we applied the Heckman sample selection model, a statistical technique that addresses sample selection bias. The results reveal that 73 % of consumers are willing to pay a premium, with mean premiums ranging from 22 % in Italy to 26 % in France above the reference price for a 1-L bottle of conventional EVOO. Socio-demographic factors—such as age, income, education, and household size—shape the likelihood of paying a premium. Meanwhile, behavioural factors—including knowledge and perceptions of pesticide use—primarily determine the size of the premium. Consumers' age, household income, and previous purchase price also influence the premium amount, although the behavioural factors exert the strongest impact, notably in France, Greece, Portugal, and Spain. These findings offer actionable insights to support the sector's transition to sustainable pesticide use, aligning consumer preferences with the EU's Green Deal objective of halving pesticide use by 2030. • Reference-dependent contingent valuation enhances realism. • 73 % of consumers will pay more for olive oil with reduced pesticide use. • Premium for pesticide-reduced EVOO averages 22–26 % over standard prices. • Behavioural and demographic factors influence consumer WTP a premium. • Findings support EU Green Deal goal of reducing pesticide use by 50 % by 2030.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 19
Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (ES), Clínica Diagonal (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
European Commission, Horizon 2020
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.